What do you mean? In fact, China people are not only diligent, but also talented. As students from countries with the third IQ in the world, it stands to reason that other foreigners should like to train our students in China. However, this is not the case. Let me analyze the reason. First of all, foreigners think it takes too much time to train a China person. Although they can get good grades, when they enter the society, they find that their grades are actually not as good as their own students.

Once a finance professor from a famous American university talked about their future doctoral admission policy support, and they bluntly said that they might no longer accept students from China. When a reporter asked the professor what the reason was, they said that in all previous surveys, among the top 30 doctoral students who graduated from this university, more than 20 were from China, but after they really let go of these 30 people, they found that there were actually too few students who really found good jobs among these 20 people, and those foreign students who didn't get good grades were lecturers from some Google or even good universities. Therefore, it can be seen from this case that these doctoral students in China are not popular in some positions abroad. Although they have strong academic ability, this is not valued by foreigners.

From this point, we can also see the deficiency of education in China. Under the national college entrance examination system and the undergraduate training plan of universities in China, we may pay more attention to students' achievements than their abilities, so that our students seldom study textbooks when they are studying for their doctorate abroad, and they can apply this knowledge to real life. As a result, many foreign universities are unwilling to spend time and energy to train these students because it is difficult for them to achieve results.

Secondly, the United States may want to train an Indian more than China. You will find that in some financial high-tech industries in the United States, the number of Indian executives actually far exceeds that of China. We all know that there is a university in India called Indian Institute of Technology. The ranking of this school in the world is equivalent to that of Shanghai Jiaotong University in China. But if you really compare the students of Shanghai Jiaotong University and Indian Institute of Technology, you will find that many students of Indian Institute of Technology are in large enterprises like Google Finance in the United States, and the number of executives far exceeds that of Shanghai Jiaotong University. It's not that Shanghai Jiaotong University is not as popular as Indian Institute of Technology, but we will find that the undergraduates trained by Shanghai Jiaotong University are not as popular as Indian Institute of Technology abroad. I think this should also be some aspects that our undergraduate education should ponder deeply.