Judging from the present situation, most people disapprove of educating children by violent means. Today, Great Wall observers also expressed their views on this issue. Participants: Observer Li, Observer Wei Li, Observer Shimen Messenger and Observer Liu Weiya. Do you think the education method of "Wolf Dad" is reasonable? Li: Undeniably, Wolf Dad's "style education" has some truth. If there is a mistake, it will be punished, and if there is a punishment, it will be deep. At present, the education department requires that students should never be physically punished. If there is corporal punishment, teachers will deal with it seriously. This has played a very good role in protecting the rights and interests of minors, but it has also caused many teachers to be lax in the management of students, fearing that parents of students will sue the education department for being suspected of corporal punishment in the management process. I remember when I was at school, my parents would tell my teachers that they must be strictly disciplined and fight when they should. Teachers really beat some naughty students. But now, few parents will tell their teachers to call if they don't listen. On the contrary, many parents go to school to sue their superiors because their teachers are lax in discipline. This is of course caused by the increasing cost of the only child, but it also has a considerable relationship with the prohibition of corporal punishment of students. If teachers dare not take care of it, students will naturally be fearless and the status of teachers will drop sharply. Even some teachers are retaliated and beaten by students for reprimanding their students, which makes people have to worry about whether there will be the word "dignity as a teacher" in a few years. Wolf-dad-style education makes up for this loophole, which makes children feel awe and understand that there will be punishment if they do something wrong, and there will be rewards if they do something right. Over time, children naturally tend to be good and avoid evil. Therefore, Xiao Baiyou's "type education" has some truth. Wei Li: The reason why Wolf Dad attracted attention was mainly because of one result, that is, three children went to Peking University. Our society is too "result-oriented", and the goal of considering children's educational achievements always stays on the comparison of being admitted to famous universities such as Peking University and Tsinghua. When the "bonzi system" achieved the admission effect of Tsinghua and Peking University, the bonzi became a "successful tool". Sticks can only stifle childhood, which is utilitarian education and will only produce the flaunt of exam-oriented education. Only the violence of sticks has the opposite effect on adolescent children. Children under exam-oriented education can't prove their ability, and they don't necessarily have the creativity, innovation, creativity, exploration, thinking and imagination required by modern education. Once children are educated by sticks and grow up, they only know how to be obedient and unconditional, and they will use sticks in their future lives and work, or even worse, which may have a very extreme distortion of human nature. Liu Weiya: I think this is a feudal paternalistic style, but it may be in line with the exam-oriented education in China. Examination-oriented education makes you study hard, but children are lively and active by nature. Wolf dad tried to kill their nature and give them a fixed trajectory, which can lead to Peking University. But I will never force my children to go to Peking University. "Wolf Dad" thinks his education is successful. what do you think? Wei Li: Children's education should not aim at getting high marks and getting into prestigious schools, but should make themselves more adaptable to life, rely on their own wisdom and efforts to get close to their goals, and at the same time understand the true meaning of life and gain great wisdom in life. As far as the nature of clubbing is concerned, even if the child goes to Peking University, if the education in clubbing has caused serious harm to the child's immature body and fragile mind, it is a kind of abuse, and parents must bear administrative responsibility or criminal responsibility. After all, the education of children should not only be punished, but also encouraged, and this way should be moderate. We should create a democratic atmosphere, adhere to the principle of happiness, make education meet the needs of children's humanity, and let children form a healthy and complete personality. Even if you don't get into Tsinghua of Peking University, you will be better than Tsinghua of Peking University in the future. Li: The purpose of Wolf Dad is to let his children go to Peking University. He believes that after the children go to Peking University, everything after that, such as work and life, will be guaranteed. In this sense, Wolf Dad is successful. No matter what will happen to Xiao Yao, Jun Xiao and Mix, the children of Wolf Dad admitted to Peking University, from the reality of China, at least the three of them have more choices and higher success probability than non-famous college students. China people have a worship complex for Peking University and Tsinghua. As long as the students in these two schools are excellent in the impression of China people, it is true. Because of favorable policies and abundant resources, studying in Peking University or Tsinghua does have more opportunities to get guidance from masters, more opportunities to get close to high-level figures and more ways to become elites. In China's official standard thought, this is success. Liu Weiya: If we only look at this matter from the perspective of exam-oriented education, it may be effective to make rules to educate children in this way. Ambassador Shimen: I think the first thing to be clear about is the standard of successful education. After that, it was clear what role his educational methods played in children's growth. Beating a child can get him admitted to Peking University. Are you willing to receive this kind of education? Li: I won't adopt this kind of education. Although I have been saying that from the perspective of Wolf Dad, his education is successful. I also admit that Xiao Yao, Jun Xiao and Mix do have more opportunities, although they are forced by Wolf Dad. But we can't deny that under the education of Wolf Dad, Xiao Yao, Xiao Jun and Mix's childhood seems unfortunate to me. Wolf dad "prohibits children from any extracurricular activities;" If you want to visit a classmate's house, you must first submit a well-formed application form, which classmate's house you want to visit, what position this classmate holds in the class, and how good his academic performance is; Who are the classmates, what positions they hold in the class, and how their academic performance is; About how long you will stay and when you can come back; Name and telephone number of parents of classmates. Finally, the application must also be signed by the class teacher; Children don't need friends before they go to college ... "With such education, Xiao Yao, Xiao Jun and Mix's life is incomplete because they don't have their own childhood and happiness. The children became the doppelganger of Wolf Dad, and became the body double for Wolf Dad to realize his dream. I have a son. I want him to get ahead and be superior, but I hope he can live a happy life. I will give him the necessary guidance and education, but I will not force him to accept my idea. The son is still young, and anything is possible. I hope he can grow into a towering tree happily and freely. If you can't take care of both, I hope he is a happy ordinary person, not a troubled successful person. In this way, he can at least proudly say that I am myself and this is my choice. Wei Li: Did Wolf Dad spend too much effort on the word "beating", which deviated from their original actual situation, and made his description of his education style out of shape, which violated the reality? In addition, do the eyes of the public and the media focus too much on the word "beating" and ignore other scientific education methods hidden behind the family "beating" of "Wolf Dad"? After all, Wolf Dad also said, "A child who is successful in reading and being a man is good at typing. If children can play well just for fun, the logic of playing at school is wrong. "I won't take this road easily when I educate my children.