For example, the part about respecting teachers and stressing morality in Disciples Rules can still use the essence. Of course, the author emphasizes the essence here, but overemphasizes some? Parental rights? The content should be filtered out. We can emphasize respect for teachers, because teachers are our teachers and elders, but we should also pay attention to the fact that it is not in line with children's educational philosophy to ask children not to show their talents in front of elders and unconditionally obey their parents. Therefore, when adopting the educational concept in Disciples' Rules, we should treat it rationally and use it flexibly. We must resolutely abandon the general way of brainwashing education. Because true respect is mutual, rather than yielding to the authority of parents, let children blindly accept their parents' views and lose the ability to think and express independently. We should pay attention to cultivating children's independent thinking ability, let them identify themselves and shape her with correct values. Then she will tell what is right and what is wrong.
But I think there is a saying in Disciples Rules? Warm in winter and cool in summer? It still has certain educational significance. It tells children to learn to appreciate their parents' care and love, so that parents can interact with their parents with the same warm care and love, which has a certain positive effect on the establishment of parent-child relationship. Extending to the relationship with society, children often feel goodwill and love from different aspects of society, and children tend to be kind to others. Compared with children who grew up in a bad environment, this will be much healthier psychologically.
In a word, whether many things in Disciple Rules have positive educational significance needs to be questioned, so parents should be discerning when using them.