Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Education and training - Analysis steps of tortoise
Analysis steps of tortoise
1. The internal auditor is required to train the employees of this department on the six key issues of tortoise diagram, so that they can understand the connotation of tortoise diagram.

2 leaders at all levels should be able to draw and be familiar with the contents of each part of the turtle map.

3. Require all departments to first clarify whether there are documents (program documents, relevant laws and regulations or technical specifications, guidance documents) in the existing process.

4. Each department should clarify the interface relationship and ensure that the process is monitored/evaluated.

5. Establish the input and output of the interface, and know what the input is, who will provide it to you, what the output is, and to whom.

6. What are the records of the existing process, whether there is a list, whether there is a blank sample, whether it will be used, and to whom the records are submitted?

Block 1: It is the body of a turtle and mainly describes the process name. All departments are required to identify the process and find out the COP process, support the process/sub-process, manage the process, fill in the identified process name, and require the process name to be accurate and consistent with the actual situation. * Special note: COP process is basically involved in Chapter 7 of TS 16949 standard.

Box 2: It's the left front foot of the tortoise. Please write clearly how to do it, fill in the relevant process control procedures, supporting guiding documents and methods, etc. , and fill in the details, shall not be omitted.

The third column: the right front foot of the tortoise refers to the description of related resources, how to use them, and fill in the materials, machines, testing equipment, computer systems, software, etc. used in this process.

Box 4: It's the turtle's right hind leg. It should describe who is responsible for doing this and the requirements for qualifications, and pay special attention to the skills requirements and ability training of personnel.

Box 5: It is the left hind leg of the tortoise. It is necessary to describe the key measurement/evaluation contents currently used, such as matrix table, transition diagram, key indicators, monthly report, etc.

Box 6: It is the head of the tortoise, and it is a description of the process input involved. Input is also a requirement and the key to analysis. The actual input may be documents, drawings, materials, samples, digital and analog models, tools or plans or information. The source and quantity of input and its relationship with other processes shall be clearly defined, and the requirements of relevant laws and regulations shall be considered.

Box 7: It is the tail of the tortoise, and it is a description of the output involved in the process. The output is also provided evidence, which can be specific products and documents, and should be related to effective evaluation and measurement. The actual output evidence should be filled in in detail and traceable. Box 2, Box 3 and Box 7 are interrelated. How to make box 2? It is our current procedural documents, guiding documents and practices (practices sometimes refer to keeping records). The raw materials, accessories, equipment, testing means and mould tools involved in the regulations and guidance documents are the ways to complete the process in box 3, and the evidence in box 7 is mostly in fourth-order form or in kind.

Box 7 and box 5 are related. The content in column 7 is objective evidence, and applicable reference requirements can be selected, such as Chapter 6 of procedure documents, main account of records, APQP file package, etc. Box 3 deals with the management process of the company.

Boxes 3 and 4 mainly involve resource requirements such as personnel, equipment, facilities and funds. Because resource allocation needs high-level decision-making, it should be supported by high-level.

Box 5 includes expected indicators in addition to the current evaluation indicators.