Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Education and training - There is no shortage of funds for teacher training, and there are many training modes, but teachers are not optimistic. Why?
There is no shortage of funds for teacher training, and there are many training modes, but teachers are not optimistic. Why?
Teachers' continuing education and training seems lively and diverse. What is the actual effect? I'm afraid only front-line teachers can participate in it!

As the principal of a village-level primary school, I have participated in various trainings at all levels in recent years. In fact, some training can't be done if you don't want to participate, continuing education can't pass, you are not qualified to evaluate professional titles, you can't take selection exams, and even the promotion of professional titles will be affected. Teachers' continuing education and training mainly includes online training and centralized training.

The original intention of training is to improve the overall quality of teachers and let them establish the concept of lifelong learning. But at this stage, most online training is a mere formality, which has not only failed to promote the professional growth of teachers, but has become a burden for teachers! At the beginning of school, the Education Bureau or the teacher training center issued a notice asking teachers to complete the training tasks according to the time node.

Next, a month or more of online training began. Teachers are busy, open the training website every day, log in with their own account password, and the system starts to time and record the study time. In the video, I don't know who the sacred teacher is, but in reality, do teachers have to go to class to correct their homework? After the accumulated time is completed, enter the next court and continue to play automatically ... After the class is completed, extract several training logs from the Internet, learn lessons, submit papers and end the training.

In addition to completing the task, what practical effect can such training achieve? It's not that teachers don't want to learn. The titles of experts and professors in online training lectures are dazzling, and most of them are policy and theoretical, lacking practicality and operability, and grassroots teachers don't buy it.

So, what is the effect of centralized training? In the past two years, I have participated in the intensive training of key teachers and rural principals. Both trainings last for one week and are managed in a closed way. Just like students, work and rest on time. We invest with great expectations. A few days later, experts and professors came and went like hemp, using PPT from a few years ago and repeating the same old story. Some lessons were heard a few years ago, but the order hasn't changed after a few years. Really speechless! That's why we come to study for a few days. Instead of this, it is better to let the excellent teachers in the front line give us some lessons, which is more operable. The training content is seriously out of touch with teaching. Some professors' lectures sound reasonable, but they are not needed when they go back to school!

The excitement of form can't hide the weakness of reality. The so-called training makes sense Training should not only preach theories, situations and ideas, but also be pragmatic, which can solve teachers' troubles in teaching. This kind of training is what teachers are willing to participate in, and it can really promote the growth of teachers!