Because of the epidemic at the beginning of the year, most training institutions are actually operating in a relatively difficult way. In this case, training institutions are not profitable, but also face high rents, joining fees and labor costs. Most training institutions will be unable to afford it, and then choose bankruptcy or run away. This is the case in Xin Ran Art School. When the school closed, the person in charge of the institution posted a notice at the door explaining the reason for closing, but most parents didn't buy it. They came here to let their children learn piano. They are not shareholders and should not consider these. Most parents said that if they can't continue to open, they should communicate in advance, refund tuition fees, and suddenly close the door without sincerity.
Besides, the head of Xin Ran Art School is very clever. He directly made an announcement explaining the reasons, so that his parents could not sue him for fraud, nor would it constitute a criminal case, but a civil dispute. This time, Xin Ran Art School owes parents about 3 million tuition fees, which is relatively high. After the closure of Xinran Art School, some parents have a strong awareness of rights protection, no longer do useless work, and go directly to the court to sue the person in charge of the institution, but most parents still hold the illusion that the person in charge of Xinran Art School will come forward to solve the problem.
Regarding the sudden closure of Xinran Art School and the debt of 3 million tuition fees, the relevant law firms gave such suggestions:
1. Parents should collect evidence to see if there is any false promise from the institution, and they are still promoting tuition fees before closing.
If Xin Ran Art School is suspected of false promises, it will still publicize and collect tuition fees before it closes. Then, the person in charge of Xinran Art School constitutes a crime of fraud, and the amount of 3 million is not a small amount. As long as a report is made, the public security organ will immediately investigate and investigate the criminal responsibility of the person in charge of Xin Ran Art School.
2. If there is no evidence to prove that there is false propaganda in Xinran Art School, the act of charging fees can only be a civil dispute.
If it does not constitute a criminal case, a civil dispute needs to be brought to the court. The court ruled that the person in charge of Xinran Art School had paid the liquidated damages by returning the tuition fees to the parents.
However, lawyers also said that in many similar cases, it is difficult to recover tuition fees, because the heads of many training institutions really have no money and no assets to auction, because they can't continue to operate. In this case, it can only be dropped. Of course, if there is a malicious transfer of assets, it will violate the law and bear criminal responsibility.