My personal opinion is that the written test can be reviewed by yourself, and there is no need to report to the class, but the training class can play an auxiliary role after all, and can give you some suggestions for the problems arising in your review. I believe it will help you to some extent, but the interview training class is very necessary (here I only recommend Tuhua and Zhonggong to buy their written books, which is very good. The latter has participated in their intensive interview class, which is even more impressive, especially the simulated examination room interview is very acupuncture for actual combat. But whether it is a written test or an interview, reading a good book is the key. After the training class, it is more targeted to have something to listen to. Let me give you some points to review. The first problem is to keep the paper clean and tidy, giving reviewers a refreshing feeling. Looking at the secretary's routine, the first question is to summarize the full text, which is similar to the central idea of middle school, but there is a word limit. Let's make a draft on the grass paper first and straighten it out. Before you formally start writing, the second question usually asks you to propose solutions to the problems in the article. What should be noted here is that it must be listed point by point, and don't write a paragraph. The test here is your organization, which makes your thinking clearer. The last question is for you to discuss them according to the content of the article. The fixed routine is: the phenomenon-reason-solution-summary and sublimation of the reference materials. I suggest you look at the scribbled books (their template form is very practical), which are very targeted to the exam. In other words, the ideas given by scribbling are exactly the routines that the reviewers want to see. In fact, the reference materials don't matter. Before the exam, everyone recommended me to talk for half a month. I took a look, because the words in it are official, not the sentences we usually use. Although they are excellent, to be honest, I can't remember them clearly when I took the exam. You see, all the questions I told you above are based on the phenomena in the text. I think the application questions should be answered. The most important thing in the exam is to be familiar with the whole routine. When it comes to changing materials, you just need to change the content of the answer and then fill it in. When you are reading a book, you should write at least three articles, first look at the topic, then answer it yourself, and then look at the gap against the standard answer. This comment is super effective. I didn't take a look at the national civil service entrance examination in 2008, and I took the exam in 45 years. In 2008, the provincial civil servants took the exam in 68, because they were all fixed routines and fixed templates. What I told you was my experience in taking the civil service exam. I think it is this review method that laid the foundation for me to take the civil service exam this time. I hope I can help you, and finally I wish you success.