On the one hand, educational institutions should be banned, on the other hand, parents should understand that holidays are the time for children to rest and start over. Too many holiday curriculum arrangements are not what children want, and will not achieve substantial soaring curriculum quality. There are many children who need to attend three or five interest classes seven days a week, which is not in the school curriculum. Since kindergarten, a vicious competition has begun. Parents' reasons and starting points are very real, and what they have learned and what they have not learned are clear at a glance! In order not to let children lose at the starting line, they substantially changed the original intention of giving children interest classes.
Reducing the burden is a rhetoric, but how to really reduce the burden still needs a long way to go, including the learning content of the school and the range of knowledge that children can accept. It also includes parents' expectations of their children and the expectations that children can achieve. It also includes social factors, external recognition factors, reasons for the establishment of educational institutions and so on. It is difficult to reduce the burden by banning education and training institutions.
Can banning education and training institutions from running classes during holidays really reduce the burden?
Shout every year, ban every year, for many years, year after year.
This is the case with off-campus education and training. Therefore, this phenomenon occurs because there is demand in the market, parents need it, and the education administrative department knows that it can't do it.
Think about it, the education administrative department divides the school into three or six grades, and concentrates the superior teacher resources in a few schools, so that students can have good classes and poor classes when they are divided into classes. Whether they can go to a good junior high school or a good high school depends entirely on their grades, so parents can't help worrying. When parents are in a hurry, they naturally go to training institutions and find training teachers. So, how to ban off-campus training institutions? Who will ban it? How to ban it?
Therefore, the prohibition of off-campus training institutions can at best be regarded as improving the boiling point of soup, rather than taking measures to stop it. The radical solution is to rationally allocate existing educational resources, so that parents do not have the psychological pressure of good schools and poor schools, so that students do not have high or low grades. Everyone can compete on an equal footing until the college entrance examination. Otherwise, everything will be in vain.
The first is that so far, as long as it is a formal and compliant institution, it has not been banned from running classes in the summer vacation.
The second is that if it is really banned, it will really lighten the burden of those who shout for it. The reason is also very simple-out of sight is clean.
If you can't see others learning, you will think that others will not learn, and your psychology will be "practical".
Of course, some people will study harder, because they think it will be a good opportunity to catch up [laugh and cry] [laugh and cry]
In fact, people who really study hard rarely care about reducing the burden. These people have long understood that the so-called burden reduction will eventually be made up in another form.
The burden at school is reduced, and it will naturally increase outside the school. The only difference is that some people teach themselves, some people ask for help, and some people just sign up for classes.
Even if you can shut down all institutions, can you still control other people's parents not to let their children study?
Don't always think that parents who enroll their children in classes are passive, blindly following the trend, or being fooled.
Talk to those parents more, and you will know what they think, and let you know what these parents have done besides signing up for classes. In fact, for them, joining classes has never been the only choice for others, but it will be relatively more efficient at present.
I wonder if students can reduce their burdens. Anyway, parents' financial pressure should be reduced!
As far as my sister's children are concerned, the tuition fee for one semester is several times higher than that of the school. This is still a cram school in a small county, and the environmental teachers in the cram school are also relatively general.
Her children are only in the first grade of primary school. Oh! Moreover, when she was a preschool teacher herself and my father was a retired teacher, they would rather send a cram school!
Why? Is there much money? Certainly not, just because parents teach themselves and can't keep up with the pace of education in the times! In addition, children don't want to study hard when they teach themselves, and parents don't have the dignity of teachers. For a seven-year-old child, learning it means learning from the teacher. Don't contradict me. I've seen my sister do it herself several times and lose again. By her own admission, it is indeed easier to teach other people's children than to teach her own. ...
I don't know what I should study at school, but I have to spend more money on cram schools … if I don't find out and solve this reason, it seems that I really can't reduce it! ?
It is said that it takes someone who tied the bell to solve the problem. They are wrong about the disease and prescribe the wrong prescription, which may relieve it, but it can't cure the root.
Prohibiting education and training institutions from running classes on holidays will be appropriately alleviated, but it is difficult to completely solve the problem of student burden.
The slogan of reducing the burden has been shouted for nearly 30 years. The real problem is that the burden on students is getting heavier and heavier. In fact, the current education department no longer regards reducing the burden as the focus of education.
So, where does the burden of students come from?
Originated from the fierce competition in education, that is, today's education involution.
This is a news that it is forbidden to make up lessons before 10, and the local education bureau clearly stated that it is true. However, after 10, let's look back to see if the heavy academic burden of students has been alleviated.
It is indeed a powerful medicine to prohibit off-campus education and training institutions from making up lessons during holidays, but the key lies in whether this measure can really land, because once it lands, a large number of off-campus training institutions will close down. Because there is no supplementary funds for summer vacation, the general training institutions can't support it at all.
If the policy is really implemented, where can the children go during the winter and summer vacations that last for more than two months? This requires overall consideration of opening campus, running community classes, opening museums and science and technology museums. Let students have places to go and activities to participate in. As a systematic project involving all aspects of society, all links are indispensable.
Violent medicine can really return more extracurricular time to students. However, the pressure of the college entrance examination cannot be alleviated in this way. More parents choose to hire 1 to 1 tutors, hidden extra-curricular tutoring, and intensive remedial classes from Monday to Friday nights, which puts pressure on children to work overtime. The original off-campus tutoring mode will usher in great changes.
The senior high school entrance examination is a shunt examination, and the college entrance examination is a competitive selection examination. Choosing the best candidate is the basic principle. The ultimate solution is to make the enrollment system of senior high school entrance examination more diversified and reduce the educational anxiety of families and parents.
However, if such a regulation is really introduced, I believe every parent will still welcome it with both hands. What did you say?/Sorry?
It can relieve some of the pressure, but it will not have much effect in essence.
At present, the intensity of this rectification is unprecedented. It is rumored that teaching and training institutions can't start classes in summer vacation, which is bound to have a great impact on the teaching and training industry. A considerable number of children's academic pressure will be alleviated in the short term, but I think the impact will be limited in the long run.
My reason is also very simple. Under the baton of entrance examination, the whole situation of educational competition has not changed fundamentally. Therefore, even if institutions are not allowed to offer training courses in summer vacation, the pressure of teaching and training cannot be shaken.
In fact, the admission rate of the senior high school entrance examination is still only half. Under such an overall situation, even if the primary school stage is fully implemented, it is not allowed to offer any form of make-up lessons in the summer vacation, and even if the school is not allowed to leave homework, in my opinion, it cannot fundamentally change the problem of the senior high school entrance examination papers. Parents will still take other ways, such as seeking small workshops, workshops for famous teachers and conducting various trainings.
However, it remains to be seen how far-reaching the impact will be.
Sure！ Very clear. Before and after the 1990s, there were not so many extracurricular tutoring institutions, which were still guided by the baton of the college entrance examination, but the society was calm. The school occasionally organizes graduating classes to make up lessons during holidays, so parents don't have so much burden and complaints. But everything has changed in recent years. Why? It's the extracurricular tutoring institutions. The commercialization of educational resources, especially after the introduction of private education, has led to irreversible bad competition in the educational situation. I think we must control and guide the benign development of private education and control the commercialization of educational environment. At present, the proliferation of educational publications and materials, the proliferation of extracurricular counseling institutions, and the wanton development of online and offline counseling institutions are all objects that need to be quickly rectified in the current cultural and educational front! Without vigorously rectifying this chaos, there will be no benign development of modern education!
At present, the academic burden of students is really heavy, mainly because the academic burden of students in cities is relatively heavy, while the academic burden of students in rural areas is not very heavy on Sunday winter and summer vacations.
According to my observation, some rural students are basically playing games and playing mobile phones in winter and summer vacations, and few students will study. It was not until the beginning of school that they began to write their homework crazily.
Even, some students don't do their homework at all in winter and summer vacations. When they get to school, teachers can't do anything about them. The parents of these children are working outside, and teachers can't call their parents.
Students in the city have a heavy academic burden, not because the school's learning tasks are heavy, but because parents are generally anxious now, and many parents will "invisibly" create a lot of pressure on their children.
Previously, due to the lack of supervision of extracurricular counseling institutions, anxiety and false propaganda created by extracurricular counseling institutions did exist. However, the real incentive for the whole people to attend remedial classes is that parents have too high expectations for their children.
Some media have investigated it. Among all remedial subjects, parents often choose math, science and English, and few people choose Chinese or geography.
Why? Because mathematics and English are two subjects, learning badly will affect the results of the college entrance examination. Whether it is the senior high school entrance examination or the college entrance examination, learning mathematics and physics well can not only get into a good school, but also choose a good major in the college entrance examination.
In other words, most parents enroll their children in extracurricular remedial classes, mainly because of the high return on investment in education, especially in science and engineering. By learning math, physics, chemistry and English well, it is easier for children to turn their educational investment into personal benefits.
In addition, great changes have taken place in the education and training industry compared with more than ten years ago.
At the beginning of the education and training industry, students with poor grades chose to enroll in extracurricular remedial classes. Now students with good grades will also choose to apply for postgraduate remedial classes. In other words, many extracurricular tutoring classes are now training excellent students, not making up the difference.
It is precisely because many parents subjectively think that their children can do better in the exam and their children can be better than other students. It is precisely because parents expect too much from their children that the demand for cram schools is getting stronger and stronger.
If all the problems are caused by extra-curricular tutoring institutions, in fact, it is difficult for us to explain why there has been a craze for public examinations and textual research in society, and even a craze for "learning the piano for all" has been set off in some areas.
Take learning the piano as an example. Some parents enroll their children in interest classes, let them learn the piano, take the exam after learning the piano, and then take part in the competition after the exam. Is this the result of the publicity of interest classes?
South Korea, deeply influenced by Confucian culture, has also seen the upsurge of enrolling in extracurricular remedial classes. 1980, the Korean government issued a policy prohibiting any form of tutoring. However, these policies have not had any effect, and extracurricular tutoring is still repeatedly banned.
At that time, extracurricular tutoring institutions were banned, and after making up lessons in winter and summer vacations, these extracurricular tutoring institutions went from the ground to the "underground". The previous problems have not been solved, but some new problems have emerged. Later, this provision was abolished by the Korean court on the grounds of "unconstitutionality".
At present, there are various regulations in Korea that prohibit make-up classes. For example, make up lessons after class can't be later than 9 pm. If there are students in extracurricular remedial classes at 9 pm, they will be severely punished. You can even report to your parents. If the report is true, the local education management department will impose fines on extracurricular counseling institutions and parents.
It is said that some retired people often wander around the streets of extracurricular tutoring classes to see whose children are still in extracurricular tutoring classes after 9 pm, and then report them, because there are rewards for reporting.
Even so, many problems remain unsolved, and the pressure on Korean students is increasing, and parents are becoming more and more anxious.
Looking back on our course of reducing the burden, you will find that many parents complained about the heavy burden of school work before, and later the education management department forced the burden reduction order. The school's academic burden has indeed been reduced. Some schools don't even assign homework, and students leave school after 5 o'clock.
However, after school, students have no autonomy and cannot arrange their own time. Parents take their children directly to extracurricular tutoring classes, and children either go directly to extracurricular tutoring classes or are on their way to extracurricular tutoring classes.
The craziest parents I've ever met. After the child left school at 5 o'clock, the parents reported three extracurricular remedial classes to the child. Children spend half an hour first and attend two hours of English cram school. After finishing the English tutoring class, I will spend half an hour in the interest class of Taekwondo, and when I get home at night, I will have an hour of oral English online class with foreign teachers.
Such an estimate of learning intensity is unacceptable to most adults. Children should study at least 6 hours a day at school, after school. I have to study for another 4 hours, and study 10 hours every day. Can the pressure on children be less? Can the burden be light?
Therefore, the key to the problem is not the school, nor the extracurricular tutoring institutions, but the "score-oriented" education evaluation system. As long as the senior high school entrance examination is based on the results, then parents must hope that their children can get good grades, and the result is 90 points. Parents hope that they can work hard to get 95 points, and their children can get 99 points before. Parents still hope that their children can work hard to get a 100 score.
-End-
I don't want to ban training courses, because the existence of training institutions can reduce the training cost of each child, and teachers also have institutional management constraints. If there is no organization, those teachers will all fly alone, and the expenses will come up at once. The person who received the money is gone. You don't know who to look for. I don't know what to do if I don't come for three days or two. I can't keep changing teachers, can I?
Some people say that it is easy for children to save money if they don't study after closing the institution. You belong to the word "Du", but I'm not. I still want to make my children better.
Many people who call for reducing the burden on their children are reluctant to invest in them, and some of them are useless because they can't invest. Others are very rich, with green cards and maple leaf cards. I don't have a future or money. I want my children to have a good future. It is better not to learn. We study harder, and we can overtake in the corner!
In modern society, parents pay more and more attention to the education of the next generation. In the past, the parents of the older generation did not attach importance to the education of their offspring, and many children dropped out of school after graduating from junior high school.
With the development of the times, both sons and daughters, ordinary parents will attach great importance to their children's education, and even daughters will invest heavily in training.
Many educational institutions have set up educational and training institutions, which have captured parents' desire for success. For a time, various educational and training institutions have sprung up on the market. Various educational and training institutions have deceived parents, who don't know which one to choose.
The good times didn't last long. I don't know when it started. The education and training institutions that once made parents crazy were gradually ignored by the market, and many education and training institutions withdrew from the education market one after another.
Why have educational and training institutions changed from popular to unpopular? This is related to the quality of the education and training institutions themselves.
The lack of supervision by the relevant departments on the current education and training institutions has led to many inferior education and training institutions hanging in the market, attracting parents to send their children to training institutions by exaggerating their children's academic qualifications.
Many educational institutions have average teachers and are simply incapable of educating children well. In order to make money, they tricked parents into sending their children to school.
This kind of behavior can only deceive parents temporarily. After a long time, parents saw that their children's academic performance had not improved. Naturally, they knew that the teaching staff of education and training institutions were not good, and finally they demanded a refund of tuition fees.
Many educational institutions fill in the blanks, not to cultivate the future of the motherland at all, but to make money. Over time, parents no longer choose educational institutions with their eyes closed as they did at the beginning, but learn about their favorite educational institutions in an all-round way and the teaching staff of educational institutions from multiple angles.
It is difficult for educational institutions to enter the business easily now. Under this premise, many educational institutions have to lay off a large number of employees to maintain the operation of educational institutions through layoffs.
It rained all night, and the relevant departments began to pay attention to the supervision of educational institutions, which made it more difficult for educational institutions to make mistakes.
There is a reason why the relevant departments suddenly monitor educational institutions. A few years ago, the education and training industry showed crazy growth, which led to a large amount of capital hot money pouring into the education and training industry.
The excessive influx of capital from any industry is actually a bad thing. Too much capital flows in, capital is king, and everything is decided by capital.
Nowadays, the industry of educational institutions is not as good as before. There are several reasons why it is not as good as before.
1, false propaganda, serious price fraud.
2. Large-scale capital intervention
3. Intensify the social anxiety of raising a baby and restrain the fertility rate.
4. Affect the normal teaching order in primary and secondary schools, and challenge the fairness of education.
The country has long advocated reducing the burden on students, but schools and parents seem to turn a deaf ear. The school gives students a lot of homework, and many students often do homework until the early hours of the morning, which has a bad influence on sleep and rest.
Parents send their children to training institutions to study, which takes up the time that children should rest, leading to children going to training institutions to study in addition to school.
Parents are advised to arrange their children's growth time reasonably in the future. It is not necessary to send their children to educational institutions, and they can study in educational institutions appropriately.