Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Education and training - Nanning judge training center
Nanning judge training center
Nowadays, contracts are absolutely very important in our lives. It is precisely because of the existence of the contract that it can be regarded as a constraint on both parties. Once a certain breach of contract occurs, it can also be prosecuted through the contract. Although the contract existed from the beginning, not everyone can handle it well in the development process. Because of this, there are many legal disputes, and even some people come to court to sue for mediation.

The tenant is in arrears with the rent of 6000 yuan. There are such a pair of homeowners and tenants in Nanning, Guangxi. In the process of renting a house, a contract was signed in the early stage, but in the process of performing the contract in the later stage, the tenant not only refused to pay the room fee, but also attempted to breach the contract. Under such circumstances, the landlord came to the court to file a lawsuit and took the tenant to court. Finally, after mediation by the court, the tenant was sentenced to refund the rent of 6000 yuan.

6000 yuan coin tenant is very angry. He should have actively performed the contract before breaking it, but he was dissatisfied with the owner and the court. He came to the court directly with a coin weighing 6000 yuan and 80 Jin to pay the rent. Because it takes a long time for the court to count coins by itself, the court staff took the coins to the bank, less than half an hour before the bank left work. In desperation, the court staff can only carry the coins back and order the tenant to transfer the rent of 6000 yuan to the account.

What did the court say? When the court proposed to repay the loan by transfer, the tenant verbally refused. However, the court told the tenant that such venting behavior not only violated morality, but also violated relevant laws. According to the relevant laws of our country, the people's court may impose a fine or detention on judicial personnel who obstruct them from performing their duties by personal emotions, including venting their anger. After informing the tenant of this behavior, the tenant said that he would repay the arrears by transfer. This is absolutely a ridiculous farce. The person who was wrong was himself, and he wanted to make trouble for others by venting his anger.

In fact, there are such people in real life. I don't know whether I watched too many TV dramas or short videos. I found such a way to fight against our law. You know, before the law of China, the judgment is quite fair. Under such circumstances, it is illegal to vent anger and hinder law enforcement officers from performing their duties.