At present, there are problems in grass-roots party organizations in China: First, the role of "number one" of individual party organizations is not accurate, and the party building consciousness is not strong. The performance is as follows: the "top leaders" of individual party organizations put their work focus and main energy on business work, ignoring the responsibility of branch secretaries, paying insufficient attention to branch construction and party member management, and there is a phenomenon that party building work is "important, secondary and not busy"; Some leaders of grass-roots party organizations are not familiar with the party building business, and they can't find the starting point and focus of grass-roots party building, which is closely related to the center and serves the overall situation. Their work is "like an abacus", dialing and dialing, moving and moving; Although some can combine grass-roots party building with central work and business construction, they are not energetic enough to forge ahead and face difficulties in practical work, and the results are not obvious. Second, a few grass-roots party organizations are passive in party building and the quality of their work is not high. The performance is as follows: convey the instructions of superiors, be satisfied with the meeting, read the documents, and convey the leaders' speeches. As for how to understand the spiritual essence, how to unify the idea of "one lesson" and how to implement it in combination with reality, there is no following; Some branches did not give full play to collective wisdom when studying and deploying important work, and replaced collective leadership with leadership "meetings". Without collective research and democratic discussion; Some branches want to save trouble and are afraid of trouble. When they study the party building work, they often replace the branch committees with enlarged branch committees, and even simplify the party work procedures at will, which weakens the role of the collective leadership of the branch to a certain extent. Third, individual party cadres lack a sense of honor and their ability and quality are weak. Cadres of minority parties lack systematic training and basic understanding of party affairs knowledge, and can't grasp the rules and essentials. Grasping the party building work is often three minutes of enthusiasm; Influenced by the market economy and bad external environment, some cadres in party member have serious materialistic tendencies. They always think that grasping the party building work is too vain, not as real as economic work and professional work, and they lack a sense of honor and value recognition. There are still some party cadres who are not good at mass work and lack the ability to properly solve mass difficulties and actively deal with thorny issues, which fundamentally weakens the cohesiveness and combat effectiveness of party organizations. Fourth, a few grass-roots organizations in party member have a single form of education and weak management and supervision. In terms of education, most inner-party organizational life still focuses on reading newspapers and learning documents, which is not closely integrated with work practice, with a single and boring form, formalism and randomness in organizational life, a tendency to simplify party class education, and a gap in the implementation of the "three meetings and one lesson" system; Some Party branches do not regard the implementation of organizational life system as an effective way to educate and manage party member. Party member reported his thoughts or participated in inner-party discussions with more big talk, rhetoric and empty talk, but less truth, truth and heartfelt words; Individual party organizations lack basic knowledge education and regular training for activists who join the party, and lack patience and meticulous ideological work for cadres, workers and grassroots people who have an urgent and difficult desire to join the party; In terms of management, there is a lack of strict and effective measures to deal with party member who does not consciously fulfill his obligations as a party member, participate in the inner-party life and pay party dues. The evaluation of party member's democracy is often just a simple cross, lacking communication and face-to-face evaluation; Party member, who violates discipline slightly, tends to be lenient and soft, which leads to some long-standing problems and even spread. Fifth, there is a gap in the implementation of the inner-party system by some grass-roots party organizations, and the mechanism is not working well. The performance is as follows: some grass-roots party organizations hold several positions, and they are in charge of party affairs and government affairs, with unclear job responsibilities and unclear division of tasks, unable to grasp the key points of work, and even ignore party affairs; Some principals and deputy secretaries do not have a strong sense of collective leadership and the consciousness of implementing democratic centralism. They like to make personal decisions when things happen and don't want to play the role of members. They even worry that promoting democracy is not conducive to centralization. The assessment mechanism of party building needs to be improved, the assessment indicators are more general and difficult to quantify, and there is no timely and effective monitoring measures and constraints, which leads to poor operability of party building assessment and affects the implementation of the responsibility system to some extent.