Recently, the incident of "deleting ancient poems from primary school textbooks" has attracted much attention. Some people support it, others oppose it. The fundamental reason is that China people want to adapt to modern development, but they don't want to get lost and lose their roots. So I think we should support reducing the burden, but oppose cutting into ancient poetry. Reducing the burden is to reduce unnecessary burden. Now the mountain of exercises and endless classes are really unnecessary burdens for students, not ancient poems. Feng Jicai, a writer, also criticized the current primary education, believing that it has seriously affected the free development of students. Public opinion has played a role, and society and the government have begun to have a sense of reducing burdens. But sadly, the relevant departments tried to reduce the burden by deleting ancient poems. The sages have long warned us to "prescribe the right medicine" in order to really solve the problem. involve

If the department fails to prescribe the right medicine, I am afraid it will not only reduce the negative, but also cause serious future trouble. Traditional culture is the root of a country, and a country without traditional culture is like duckweed without roots, and ancient poetry is an important part of traditional culture. Taking ancient poetry as an example, it is destroying our own traditional culture, making us think about where we came from and where we are going. Former US President Nixon once said: "When the next generation of China people forget their own culture, we can attack this nation." Do we have to wait until the United States hits our door to wake up eloquently? To this end, traditional culture must be passed down. With the right direction, we must also have the right method. Using ancient poetry to operate is obviously contrary to the correct direction, not to mention the correct approach. Pupils are simply a blank sheet of paper. If you delete the ancient poems, there will be no traces of them on this piece of white paper. Although the environment can't determine a person, it affects a person to a great extent. Without the environment of ancient poetry, it is difficult to arouse students' love for ancient poetry, and it is not conducive to inheriting the traditional culture of China. In fact, it is more important to reduce students' mental burden than material burden. We shouldn't delete ancient poems, but we must make a fuss about them. It is better to actively cultivate students' love for ancient poetry, create a good environment, and let students get spiritual edification and pleasure in learning ancient poetry. Isn't this more valuable than deleting ancient poems? Taking ancient poems lightly will make students mistakenly think that ancient poems are insignificant; When they study ancient poems in the future, they are likely to have contempt and disgust. The feeling of beauty in ancient poetry is so empty that his spiritual field must be barren. If so, the so-called inheritance of China traditional culture is wishful thinking, and China will become a rootless duckweed sooner or later. The real burden reduction is to avoid the recurrence of the farce of "schoolbags are heavier than students", so that students can learn in happiness and get spiritual edification and pleasure. Deleting ancient poems is to drive primary school students away from the soil of China culture and make students lose their feelings about the beauty of ancient poems. So sad!

Support the burden reduction and oppose the operation of ancient poetry, our pursuit!