As for the South China Sea issue, China is very clear. The South China Sea belongs to China, and the illegal occupation by any country is unreasonable and violates international conventions. In addition, the International Court of Arbitration has made a ruling on the South China Sea, and the ruling result of the International Court of Arbitration has also been announced. The result shows that the sovereignty of the South China Sea belongs to China, and the ruling is also very fair and just. The specific content of the ruling can be understood in this article.
1. What is the award of the international arbitration court on the South China Sea?
1On October 22nd, the Philippine government unilaterally initiated arbitration on the South China Sea dispute between China and the Philippines. 20 13 in June, the Philippine side set up a five-member China-Philippines South China Sea dispute arbitration tribunal despite the strong opposition of the Chinese side. Subsequently, in July 20 13, the second month after the establishment of the ad hoc arbitration tribunal, the secretarial service was officially "outsourced" to the Permanent Court of Arbitration on the grounds of limited human and material resources. Specific services include assisting in finding and appointing experts, issuing information and press releases, organizing hearings at the Peace Palace in The Hague, paying the fees of arbitrators and other personnel, and so on, that is, choosing the Permanent Court of Arbitration as the case registry. The expenses of the South China Sea arbitration case shall be borne by both parties. In the case of China's resolute opposition, "the Philippines paid double the money." On July 7, 20 15, the court held its first session. 20 15, 10129 October, the arbitral tribunal made an award on jurisdiction and admissibility. 2065438+July 2006 12, The Hague International Arbitration Court made a "final award" on the South China Sea arbitration case, ruling the Philippine side "victory", denying the "nine-dash line" and declaring that China has no "historic ownership" over the South China Sea.
Second, the social impact.
(1) easily leads to the abuse of litigation in many countries;
(2) cast a shadow over the growing prestige of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea;
3 threatening peace in the South China Sea;
(4) Destroy the extraordinary achievements made in the Asia-Pacific region today. "Arbitration" brought the long-standing friendly relations between the Philippines and China to a freezing point, which made the Philippines miss the golden opportunity to develop its economy. In addition, the Philippines has also lost the opportunity to jointly develop some disputed areas in the South China Sea with China. The "ruling" on the South China Sea issue has also led to the further militarization of the South China Sea and endangered the stability of the region. The beginning, evolution, ending and harm of the "South China Sea Arbitration Case" are comparable to the process of cancer cells invading healthy bodies. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea is like a healthy body. Its weakness has become the breakthrough of the invasion of "carcinogenic pathogens", and internal and external incentives have promoted the spread of diseases, leaving behind the legacy of the Convention and even the international rule of law. The ruling of the International Court of Arbitration on the South China Sea is very clear. There is no doubt about the South China Sea issue, and so is the issue of sovereignty. According to international norms and historical basis, the sovereignty of the South China Sea belongs to China, and any occupation of the South China Sea will harm China's sovereign interests. Therefore, it is necessary to follow the results of international arbitration and exercise the sovereignty of the South China Sea according to law.
Legal basis:
Article 9 of the Arbitration Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) implements the system of final arbitration. After the award is made, if the parties apply for arbitration or bring a lawsuit to the people's court on the same dispute, the arbitration commission or the people's court will not accept it.
If the award is revoked or not executed by the people's court according to law, the parties may apply for arbitration according to the arbitration agreement reached by both parties, or bring a lawsuit to the people's court.