2. This paper studies xxxx, which has strong practical value and provides a new basis for controlling accounting information distortion. The author has clear thinking, rigorous discussion process, reasonable analysis and practical results. The writing of the thesis is standardized and the sentences are fluent, which meets the requirements of academic proofreading of dissertations.
3. English: The topic of the thesis conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is average. The topic selection has academic research (reference) value (practical guiding significance). The student's ability to consult documents is average, and he can collect information about the examination system. In the process of writing, he can basically use the knowledge of the examination system and comprehensively analyze the problems of the examination system, and his ability to comprehensively use knowledge is average. The length of the article fully meets the requirements of the college, the content is basically complete, the hierarchical structure is general, and the main points are focused on certain logic, but there is a lack of personal opinions. The topics are basically the same, and the arguments are more prominent. Discussion can better serve the argument. The language expression is general, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Referring to some documents, its timeliness is general; No obvious plagiarism was found.
4. Pass the exam: the topic of the paper meets the professional training objectives, and can basically achieve the comprehensive training objectives, with less difficulty and less workload. The title of the thesis is general, and the comment is "A Complete Collection of Academic Comments of Tutors". Students' ability to consult documents is poor, and they can't collect information about the examination system comprehensively. In the process of writing, his ability to comprehensively apply the knowledge of examination system and comprehensively analyze the problems of examination system is poor. The length of the article meets the requirements of the college, the content is not complete enough, the hierarchical structure is problematic, the main points are not prominent enough, the logic is poor, and there is no personal opinion. The title of the article is biased, the argument is not prominent enough, and the discussion can't stick to the theme. The language expression is poor and the format meets the requirements of the specification; Less possession data and poor timeliness; Some contents are similar to others' achievements.
5. Good: The topic of the thesis conforms to the professional training goal, and the comprehensive training goal can be achieved. The topic is difficult and the workload is heavy. The topic selection has academic research (reference) value (practical guiding significance). The student has a strong ability to consult documents and materials, and can comprehensively collect information about the examination system. He can comprehensively apply the knowledge of the examination system, comprehensively analyze the problems existing in the examination system, and has a strong ability to comprehensively apply knowledge. The length of the article fully meets the requirements of the college, the content is relatively complete, the hierarchical structure is scientific, the main points are prominent, and the logical relationship is clear, but it lacks personal opinions. The topic is consistent, the argument is prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme. The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Rich references and strong timeliness; No plagiarism was found.
6. The topic of the paper is basically the same as the content of the paper, with complete structure and fluent language. Even the first draft, except that the paragraphs are too thin, there are not many serious grammar or spelling mistakes. The author tries to find a connection between characters in the novels of lev tolstoy and Cao Yu. From the content, the author has a further understanding of the original work and collected relevant materials. How to draw my own conclusion through the analysis of the data is the purpose of this paper, and it is at this point that the author has made great efforts.
7. The structure of the paper is complete, and each part basically conforms to xxxxx's writing standard. The title of the paper is very good and creative. In order to write this paper well, the author has done some research, especially Steinbeck's original work. It is not difficult to see from the author's reference to the original work that the author is quite familiar with the content of the original work. The language is also very sharp, and the paper is clear-headed, well-founded, with unique views, which has certain reference value and can be regarded as a good article.
8. Excellent: The topic of the thesis conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is heavy. The topic selection has high academic research (reference) value (great practical guiding significance). This student has a strong ability to consult documents and materials, can comprehensively collect information about the examination system, can comprehensively use the knowledge of the examination system in the writing process, can comprehensively analyze the graduation thesis of the examination system, and has a strong ability to comprehensively use knowledge. The length of the article fully conforms to the requirements of the college, with complete content, scientific hierarchical structure, prominent points, clear logical relationship and certain personal opinions. The topics are completely consistent, the arguments are prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme. The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Rich references and strong timeliness; There is no plagiarism.
9. The topic of the paper is meaningful. On the basis of absorbing academic research results, it is reasonable to have your own experience and put forward your own views. The argument is correct, the material is substantial, the narrative is clear and logical. Clear pronunciation and mellow voice are extremely smooth. Writing conforms to academic norms. In the future, we should further sum up experience, compare music education modes and teach music better. The paper can be submitted on time, and after careful revision, it meets the requirements of undergraduate graduation thesis.
10, the topic of this paper has strong application value, the literature is collected in detail, and the learned knowledge is comprehensively used to solve the problem. The data obtained are reasonable, the conclusion is correct and there are innovative opinions. In addition, the format of the paper is correct, the text is standardized, the organization is clear and the language is fluent. In the future, we should further sum up experience and compare moral education models, so that moral education can be carried out better. The paper can be submitted on time, and after careful revision, it meets the requirements of undergraduate graduation thesis.