China initiated the Six-Party Talks, and North Korea took the initiative to blow up nuclear facilities, but the United States refused to honor the promises made in the talks, which led to the resumption of North Korea's nuclear program.
The failure of the United States to keep its promise has led North Korea to doubt China's political credibility. China's influence on North Korea has decreased, its right to speak on the peninsula has been marginalized, and it has lost its strategic advantage in Northeast Asia.
North Korea demands that the United States promise its national security on the condition that it promotes peace through nuclear weapons and gives up nuclear weapons. However, the United States explicitly refused to make a commitment to North Korea's national security.
North Korea accelerated its nuclear weapons and missile tests with the intention of pushing South Korea and Japan to the road of nuclear weapons research and development. Once South Korea and Japan have nuclear weapons, they will get rid of the United States just as North Korea got rid of China. So the United States immediately confiscated Japan's nuclear materials.
The above is the ins and outs of the DPRK nuclear issue.
The following is an evaluation of the status quo:
The United States does not want to solve the DPRK nuclear issue immediately. Because North Korea's nuclear weapons can only deter neighboring countries, not the United States.
North Korea's nuclear weapons deter its neighbors, which gives the United States an excuse to send more troops to Northeast Asia and curb the Sino-Russian Far East strategy.
What North Korea wants is to promote peace with nuclear weapons and make the United States promise its national security. The United States used the North Korean nuclear issue as an excuse to expand its military superiority in Northeast Asia.
The purpose of the United States is not to solve the North Korean nuclear issue, but to use it. In this case, the DPRK nuclear issue cannot be solved at all.
Question 2: How do you view the North Korean nuclear issue? Small countries with nuclear weapons are rogue countries.
The world should be dominated by big countries, and it is unfair and unsafe for small countries to master big killers.
Question 3: How to understand and treat the DPRK nuclear issue needs to be divided into two parts.
1. On the one hand, North Korea is forced to develop nuclear weapons for the following reasons:
The main reason is that in the arms race between North Korea and South Korea, conventional force cannot guarantee its own security. In other words, if South Korea wants to unify North Korea, North Korea can't beat South Korea at all, so nuclear bombs should be used to protect its own security.
Conventional weapons need constant investment, and North Korea has no money at all. About $65.438+00 billion to buy 100 Su-30s, together with supporting facilities, spare parts and pilots, can't beat it, and 100 Su-30s can't compare with hundreds of South Korean F 15, F 16 and F35.
Nuclear weapons are a one-time investment. As long as part of the money is used to build nuclear weapons, there is no need to be afraid in the future.
2. On the other hand, North Korea insists on developing nuclear weapons, which seriously harms China's interests. China has repeatedly stopped North Korea, but it has gone its own way. The United States and Japan have stepped up the deployment of various weapons in Asia. It has caused a certain degree of arms race in Northeast Asia, but North Korea has failed to see the general trend in this process and has repeatedly become an excuse for the intensification of the US-Japan military alliance.
Question 4: What do you think of the North Korean nuclear issue? Since elementary school, our textbooks and parents have told us about the Korean War. We know that this "most lovely person" contributed to the Korean War, and we remember Qiu who died heroically when he was burned to death in the grass. We also know that there is no mention of volunteers fighting in North Korea in North Korean textbooks. In the present Panmunjom, where the Korean Armistice Agreement was signed, the seats of volunteers who made great contributions to American imperialism were not listed as the main participants in the war. In the communication between countries, the national interest is always in the leading position. Ordinary people think that it is right for North Korea to possess nuclear weapons, because they believe that, first, North Korea and China have forged deep feelings since the Korean War; Second, North Korea's possession of nuclear weapons can deter Japan and South Korea, and it will not be easy for US troops stationed in Japan and North Korea. So everyone thinks that helping them defend Japan and South Korea saves our strength, and because of the policy of keeping a low profile, we have a long-standing antipathy. Last but not least (the meaning of this sentence is so strange in Chinese that I have to use a half-baked English, please forgive me): it doesn't matter that North Korea has nuclear weapons, but it also has launch vehicles that can threaten Japan and the United States. As we all know, no matter how good the knife is, it will hurt you if you use it carelessly. North Korea's nuclear weapon is this knife. Since Japan can be threatened with nuclear weapons, it means that its launch vehicle can also hit Beijing! If you say no, borrow a dare! But we must be alert to this kind of behavior. The real difference between big countries and small countries in nuclear weapons is that big countries become more responsible because of nuclear weapons, while small countries can become unscrupulous because of nuclear weapons. In fact, whether it is a nuclear war or a conventional war, the possibility of North Korea defeating China is zero. But when China can't satisfy North Korea's growing appetite for aid and international issues, North Korea can do what it calls "barefoot without shoes". We can really win, but we can't lose half our mind in this game, no matter how much the whole North Korea is worth or how much a Beijing is worth. Therefore, for North Korea, we must not blindly tolerate it, or we will raise a tiger as a disaster and have endless future troubles!
Question 5: How does France view the North Korean nuclear issue? For France, they have always followed the footsteps of the United States. In fact, pure France has no influence on the North Korean issue.
Question 6: How do you view the North Korean nuclear issue? North Korea wants to win American economic aid by nuclear threat. Moreover, the benefits that the United States has given to the United States and other countries are too much, but continuing to compromise on the North Korean nuclear issue is likely to threaten China's vital interests, and China is in an embarrassing position.
Question 7: What do you think of the situation on the Korean Peninsula and its North Korean nuclear issue? China's possession of nuclear weapons in North Korea is also very terrible.
Q 8: What is China's position on the North Korean nuclear issue? On the surface, the Korean peninsula should be denuclearized. 2. The denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula has a stable situation in the Asia-Pacific region, which requires neighboring countries, including the United States and Japan. 3. The denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula should be resolved through peaceful negotiations. In fact, even if no understanding is reached, the six-party talks should continue. 5. The current regime of North Korea should be maintained. 6. North Korea should be denuclearized.
Question 9: What do you think of the increasing instability brought by North Korea's nuclear test to Asian countries, especially the central and eastern regions of China, and its adverse impact on world peace?
Question 10: What do China people think of North Korea's nuclear test? Of course, they don't want to see a nuclear test. Chernobyl in the Soviet Union. It was just a nuclear leak. That place is still uninhabitable. Just go in for a few minutes, and your hair will fall out in a few days. North Korea must build nuclear weapons at least four or five times. Any fault leading to nuclear leakage will endanger the whole northeast region. We Northeasters didn't provoke anyone. Why should we be afraid of such a thing? The roads in Dandong were destroyed in the last nuclear test. I can't understand why some South Koreans are so supportive of North China. Please show some sympathy to their compatriots.