Hua deliberately put on airs. Maybe, he is really thoughtful.
In any case, the flowery words and wordy language successfully depict the vivid image of Hamlet. He gave me a feeling of contradiction, sentimental melancholy mixed with calm and decisive persistence.
Originally "full of doubts" when he returned to China, he witnessed the combination of his uncle and mother when his father's bones were not cold. He had neither obvious approval nor clear opposition to the party. His melancholy personality made him sit there moping, and everyone's encouragement failed to change his mood to any extent.
However, when Horatio told him the news of the ghost, this melancholy immediately turned into calmness and persistence. Ignoring the advice of soldiers and friends, he insisted on talking to ghosts, and after knowing the truth, he was determined to take revenge. The calmness of asking the guards and Horatio to take an oath, and the patience after knowing the truth all showed his calmness. Say that "this is an upside-down chaotic era, but it's a pity that I have to shoulder the responsibility of reorganizing Gankun"? What kind of courage, persistent revenge action also kicked off.
In order to get revenge, he pretends to be crazy and sells stupidity, but behind his incoherence is a firm heart. Repeated temptations failed to move his heart. It is this melancholy and sentimental character that makes others completely turn their attention to his slouches over Mr. filia.
Because he is depressed in the eyes of others, it is easy to be crazy about his feelings. Personality factors made him lose his edge.
In the performance of the troupe, he added a plot similar to his uncle's killing his father, and made careful arrangements, telling the life of the actors and telling the story of Horatio, all of which showed his calmness and carefulness. And these actions, completely from the persistent revenge plan. Just after he proved the identity of his enemy, he missed the chance of revenge because of his indecision. The king was completely unprepared when praying, but Hamlet's hesitation at this moment made the immediate assassination of the king go up in smoke. He looked back and forth, from "I am."
From "easy to do" to "no, that needs to be reconsidered" and finally decided to do it when he was evil, his ideological struggle just showed his hesitation. In order to avoid "returning evil for good", he paid the price of his life in the subsequent revenge. Polonius's meddling came to an end when he spoke to the queen in almost cruel and mean language? It seems that when he stabbed behind the scenes with his sword, he did not hesitate at all, but acted decisively and simply. It's a pity that the beautiful and kind Mr. Firjia lost his father and buried his grievances with Laertes.
After discovering the king's plot, he deepened his hatred for the king and strengthened his determination to take revenge. The clever trick of stealing the bait-and-switch is the result of his wit, but he never thought that there was a more sinister trap waiting for him to drill in. Finally, the result of the sword fight was that two handsome teenagers who were used gave their lives. Before he died, Hamlet did not forget his insistence. At that moment, he no longer hesitated and stabbed the king with his sword. Traitors get the punishment they deserve, but the loss of innocent lives is always regrettable.
Indecisive melancholy made him savor the past suffering and hatred, and resolutely insisted that he finally succeeded in revenge after paying a huge price. However, the price that should not have been paid has become the victim of his contradictory character.
Finally, the regret of paying this huge price exceeds the loss caused by the verbosity of the script language.