2. The "ability" to get a "high score" is not completely consistent with the actual innovation ability. The ability to get high marks is the ability to take exams, and the ability to take exams is not equal to the actual ability. Moreover, human energy is limited. People who are too poor to get into the exam will certainly find it difficult to have more time to get in touch with reality and explore. Even if they are smart, they can only take care of one end. So people who are particularly creative hate rigid exams. Einstein dropped out of school at the age of 15, because he hated the rules and regulations of German schools and the learning methods by rote. Particularly creative people are very good at saving energy. They put all their energy into the exam and use it on the cutting edge, so that they can be creative. Some people are both creative and good at exams, which is of course not simple, but I think if they can save the energy of exams and use it on creativity, their creative achievements will be better. There are no good articles in the examination room, and the examination can't increase the total amount of social knowledge. What increases the total amount of social knowledge is research and creation. This form of examination is more conducive to evaluation and selection, rather than discovering what is invented. People are afraid to innovate in the examination room, because the risk is too great, and the exam is about scores. Therefore, the generals who pass through the examination room are likely to form some kind of copying thinking mode of looking at faces imperceptibly, which is a fetter for their future innovation. Again, there is not necessarily creation when you go out of the circle, but creation must go out of the circle. However, the exam is just an operation mode that prohibits you from going out of the circle. In this sense, exams are destined to suppress creativity.
High scores and low energy:
1, exams are creative friends. Some basic knowledge and ways of thinking consolidated and strengthened through examinations are often necessary conditions for innovation. We can't imagine Einstein being able to put forward the theory of relativity without knowledge of mathematics and physics. Today's mid-term exam questions need a lot of thinking, so people with high scores are very flexible.
2, usually immersed in theoretical research, obsessed with technology, naturally will not care too much about disputes between classmates, and is unlikely to fall into personnel disputes. Some people are greedy for profits and always lag behind their classmates, but high scores and low abilities will never be like this. Although I am divorced from my own books and studies, I can be comfortable in my work and get the respect and love of my classmates, especially in my studies.
3. High schools choose "plastic talents" instead of "available talents", so they want "knowledge content" instead of "practical skills". If everyone with low grades and high energy goes to a technical school, why go to a college?
It is impossible for a person to study hard if he wants to get high marks in the exam. Behind the high score, in addition to a solid knowledge base, the following talents are hidden: 1. Input can eliminate interference and concentrate on learning. 2. perseverance. 3. High self-control and learning ability. 4. The ability to devote energy and sweat to a goal. 5. Strong understanding and logical thinking ability, able to understand many knowledge points and grasp their internal relations. 6. Ability to use time effectively. 7. When facing challenges. Therefore, if a person with high marks and low energy can use his talent to improve other shortcomings, while a person with low marks and high energy can't even finish what students should do, let alone talk about something else.
Secondly, judging the quality of a school from the interests of the school, most of them are based on the enrollment rate, so only those who choose high scores can have a high enrollment rate.