Female college students claim to be harassed by professors, and there are rumors in a university in Ningbo. Our reporter launched an investigation.
An ordinary fresh college graduate took part in an ordinary thesis defense, but failed to get a diploma because of the second debate. In a rage, he handed a paper complaint about his previous "encounter" to the principal and shook it all out. ...
In a month's time, there was a saying in a university in Ningbo that a female college student, in order to pass the thesis, did not hesitate to "dedicate herself" to the superior leader of the thesis defense team leader and the professor who had asked her to keep an ambiguous relationship with herself. As a result, in the end, the paper was still empty. ...
For such rumors, our reporter went deep into the school investigation yesterday and tried to restore the truth. Yesterday afternoon, when talking to a reporter, the female college student admitted that it was true that the professor harassed herself frequently. But dedication does not exist. (Reporter Zheng Zhenguo, trainee of this newspaper, Monday)
List of personnel in this article (note: the schools and parties involved in this article are pseudonyms)
Professor H is the head of the Department of Public Administration of a University Law School in Ningbo. After the incident, it was said that he was going to drop out of school.
Students, who just graduated from law school, attended Professor H's class in their junior year.
Professor Z is a subordinate of Professor H, and the head of S student thesis defense group.
Students' self-report
In the first semester of junior year, Professor H became my subject teacher. On the first day of class, Professor H gave me the impression that the lecture was very level, amiable and approachable.
After a five-minute break, Professor H took the initiative to chat with the students, including me. When he learned that I was from Qinghai, and he was from Gansu, half a fellow villager, Professor H immediately asked me to leave him a phone number to facilitate future communication, so I agreed. A few days later, Professor H called me and asked me out for dinner. My idea at that time was that it was a fate to meet fellow villagers and subject professors far from home, not to mention Professor H's high theoretical level, which was also a help to my study.
The professor's restaurant confession was declined by me.
In a small restaurant near the school, we talked face to face. During this period, Professor H has been talking to me about emotional problems, saying that he is a stranger in Ningbo and has no friends of the opposite sex. I am very distressed by the disharmony between husband and wife; Before I came to Ningbo, I had a good friend of the opposite sex, but the other person was married ... I was at a loss to understand what he was saying to me, but I couldn't say anything, so I could only be a listener. After chatting for more than an hour, Professor H finally hinted at me-can I fill his emotional gap! As soon as I heard it, I understood why he asked me out to meet him, so I politely refused. I said, you can be my father at your age. Before leaving, Professor H was very angry. He left a message: "You still have a long time at school, and you will regret your decision now in the future."
After returning to the dormitory, I told my classmates about Professor H's appointment with me, and everyone advised me not to promise him. That's true, but I'm afraid I can't pass this course. The classmate also said that as long as you do well in the final exam and write it down in black and white, he won't let you fail.
The fact that the paper was not questioned was the professor's revenge.
A week after rejecting Professor H, I received a text message from him asking if I could be his lover again, but I politely refused. I kept all this information, but my mobile phone was stolen and the evidence was gone. I passed Professor H's course in the final exam, and my previous worries seemed unnecessary. After that, Professor H left me alone.
At the beginning of this year, Professor H called me and asked me if I would like to be the chief secretary to serve him alone after graduation. As soon as I heard "alone", I was determined not to go. Later, Professor H said to me, "I have helped you so much, but you don't know how to cherish ..."
In a blink of an eye, I am about to graduate. I began to worry about my thesis defense. Although the thesis tutor is not Professor H, Professor Z, the leader of my thesis defense team, is a subordinate of Professor H. ...
In June, I failed in the first debate on my thesis. I admit that my thesis may not be good enough, because I am looking for a job, and it is reasonable that I failed. But I still can't help but associate my thesis with Professor H, so I called Professor H on my own initiative and asked me why I failed. He said there was nothing wrong with your paper, except that the structure was too messy. Just adjust the order. In the second debate of the paper, Professor Z, the leader of the defense team, said no problem in front of me. I was relieved that I could get my diploma. A few days later, the study committee member of my class asked me if you want a diploma or postpone graduation. I don't know what that means. I didn't know that the second debate of the paper failed until I asked for details.
Through a female teacher in a law school, I learned the reason why the thesis failed-the college has indicators, and someone must fail. At that time, several teachers in the defense group collectively discussed who could not pass. Teachers in other groups are unwilling to report students' names, except Professor Z, who simply threw my paper away and said it was a failure. I went to see Professor Z and asked him why he did it. He didn't say anything, as if he was hiding something. I told the female teacher about Professor H's harassment, but she revealed a shocking secret to me: she was also a victim of Professor H and suffered the same thing as me. Suffering from the fact that Professor H is a leader, he dares to be angry and dare not speak.
"Dedication" is empty for the paper.
The more I think about it, the angrier I get. I wrote a document and personally submitted it to the principal to complain. The headmaster said that they would set up an investigation team to investigate my paper. As for Professor H *, it is difficult to deal with it without conclusive evidence.
At the end of July, the report of the school investigation team came out. The investigation team explained every word and sentence of my paper, and I had nothing to say about the problem. Later, the secretary of the Party Committee of the Law School talked to me and told me not to have psychological shadow, to prepare for the third debate of the thesis, and to get the diploma in June+10, 5438; As for Professor H's question, since there is no evidence, let's bury it in our hearts.
As for the so-called "dedication" for the thesis, I don't admit it. I wouldn't do such a stupid thing for a diploma. Let the school rumors go, I won't mind.
Field visit
Professor H often makes "intimate" gestures to girls.
On the school's website, the reporter searched for information about Professor H's life.
Professor H was born in the 1950s. Through my own efforts, I have gained some authority in my major field. Before coming to Ningbo, Professor H had taught in Gansu and Guangdong. It is reported that he was competing for the post of vice president of law school before the incident.
Some law school students who stayed during the summer internship recalled that most of the courses taught by Professor H were related to policy science. Professor H is very popular with students because of his lively and interesting lectures and simple explanations. Professor H never puts on airs and treats people kindly, especially students. He is willing to communicate with them and treat them as his own children. However, Professor H has a "characteristic". From time to time, he will make more "intimate" actions for girls, such as patting shoulders, pinching arms and touching faces. It feels strange.
As for the so-called S classmate "sacrificed" himself for the second argument of the thesis, all the law school students said, "I just heard that S classmate made a big noise and shook everything out."
Dialogue with Professor H.
"This student misbehaves and talks nonsense everywhere."
The reporter tried to verify everything described by S students with Professor H himself. Unfortunately, we didn't find him all day yesterday. After the reporter sent a text message to identify himself, his mobile phone was quickly turned off.
I thought Professor H was just "out of thin air". At 9 o'clock in the evening, Professor H sent us a short message with another mobile phone number, expressing his willingness to be interviewed. At first, Professor H said that he didn't know what happened to classmate S, so he had no comment. However, when the reporter insisted on telling the whole story briefly, Professor H's attitude changed greatly. He said that the school will handle this matter, and the public security organ will handle it, as long as S students produce evidence of harassing her. "This student misbehaves and talks nonsense everywhere." Professor H is a little excited.
Professor H seems to be dismissive of inviting S students to dinner a year ago to discuss their feelings. "In my capacity, will I have dinner with students?" Professor H simply hung up the phone and refused to answer the rumor of harassing S students by sending text messages and submitting articles.
School statement
"dedication" is nonsense.
Set up a multi-person investigation team and read S students' papers repeatedly from beginning to end; Get Ms. S herself, analyze the test paper word for word in front of her, and answer why she couldn't pass it realistically. This is the attitude of S student school towards the "thesis incident". Student S said that she could accept the results of the survey and believed that the teachers in the investigation team were fair and just.
Regarding the rumors in the school, the person in charge of the law school said: First, S students can't produce evidence to prove that Professor H is interested in it; The investigation at different levels proves that the failure of S students' thesis has nothing to do with Professor H, who is not a "sign-in" person, and the two cannot be confused. As for S's so-called "dedication", this is even more nonsense. "If student S has evidence, she can report the case directly to the public security organ without going through school because she has graduated." The person in charge explained.
Regarding the question of where Professor H will go, the person in charge of the law school said that as of yesterday, he was still in the school. The school can't decide whether to stay or not in the future, it depends on his own wishes.