[Comprehensive analysis]

Every leader has an idea, and the "new official" doesn't agree with the old official's idea or practice of engaging in economy, which is one reason for ignoring the "old account". Subjectively denying the "old official" is naturally unwilling to take the old road, and breach of contract is inevitable. There is also a situation related to the economy-many old accounts are messy or even rotten, and the reasons are complicated and the relationship is intertwined, so they are simply not counted.

"The new official ignores the old account" and "the new official comes back", which harms the interests of enterprises and also discounts the credibility of the government. Once this kind of atmosphere is formed, it will often make local people bear the reputation of dishonesty and drag down economic development.

Honesty is the soul and life of market economy. Looking at the whole country, the stronger the government's sense of trustworthiness, the more it can attract investment and talents and help local economic development. On the other hand, some places from Dallas to the Auditorium are not bad in resource endowment, industrial base and location advantages, that is, they can't attract investment and can't retain talents, which is probably related to the fact that these places have not formed a government integrity culture that emphasizes commitment and keeps credibility for a long time.

Some local governments have poor integrity, weak awareness of the rule of law, poor policy continuity and arbitrary decision-making, which reflects that some officials have willful power and some local powers have not yet entered the cage of the system. "People come for political reform, and people take political interests" reflects that some leading cadres like the new and hate the old, have a biased view of political achievements, and lack the power to insist that Qingshan will not relax.

[Reference countermeasures]

First, it is the "bounden duty" of the new official to pick up the "baton". Successors should not only take over power, but also take over responsibility and promise to "take over" the previous session; We should inherit and improve the reasonable decisions and contracts of our predecessors; In order to ensure the consistency and stability of government decision-making, new officials must never be allowed to take office. If we adopt the thinking of "new officials ignore old accounts", it will not only violate the organizational concept and laws and regulations, but also be extremely irresponsible to the government's integrity.

Second, implement a "lifelong accountability system" for officials. In addition to subjective consciousness, it also needs objective constraints to control "new officials ignore old accounts" All localities and departments should implement the lifelong accountability system and accountability mechanism for major decisions. For those officials who are in debt because of great joy, they will be held accountable for debt collection if they "slap their asses and leave" before paying off their debts.

Third, it is necessary to improve the "handover mechanism", maintain the continuity of work, and enable new officials and old officials to achieve seamless docking; More importantly, the judiciary should also deter "officials from breaking their promises", let the law shine a sword, safeguard fairness and justice, stir up chaos, and clean up the long-standing disadvantages of "officials relying on".