I think the author who published the paper should be responsible, followed by the academic journals that published the paper, because this paper itself is very inconsistent with the status quo, science and biology, and can not repeat its own experiments, so this paper is more of a fake paper, but it is not true, so the author of the article should pay the responsibility for it.

Involving criminal offences, it shall be handed over to the public security department for investigation. After all, after the publication of this paper, it also involves a training course, and the tuition fee of the training course is as high as 654.38+00000 yuan per person, and there are only four days of training, so the tuition fee is very expensive. Then, if his subjective motivation is illegal possession, does he use the banner of the paper and his position as the principal to cheat and formulate strategies?

First of all, as a principal and scholar, I should have studied from a scientific and objective point of view, but now I talk about opinions or papers with special functions in the name of metaphysics, so I can't repeat my experiments. And after being questioned by everyone, he had to apologize because he knew he could not deceive others. Maybe he thinks metaphysics and thought are dispensable, and others don't have enough evidence to prove that he doesn't, so he thinks it is invincible, but he still underestimates the voice of the broad masses of the people. A rebound like this is an antisocial paper. At first glance, it is full of loopholes.

Therefore, after the publication of this paper, his own reputation stinks, and he lost the position of principal. After all, he has no face to continue his studies. After all, if people like him can be tolerated to continue to educate students in the education sector, how can it bring very serious consequences?