But can we really look at nature from the standpoint of nature, or look at history from the standpoint of history? Some people say that history is a bitch and everyone is doing it in their own way. This is ugly, but it is also rough. In other words, history is a little girl, and how to dress well is poetic and civilized; There is another saying that is very philosophical: "All history is contemporary history." This is what Croce said, and everyone has many quotations. Whether it is rude words, poetic words or philosophical words, there is only one meaning, that is, it is very difficult to treat history truly and objectively from a historical perspective. Similarly, it is difficult to really look at history from the standpoint of nature. The conclusion is that it is very difficult to be a real Marxist.
If we can't look at nature from the standpoint of nature, we must look at nature with our own subjective meaning, that is, when we interpret nature, we will return to preconceived consciousness and hold an attitude similar to "six classics note me". Unfortunately, this is considered to have slipped into the "mud pit of idealism". Life will certainly not be easy in an environment where you believe in Marxism but slip into the mud of idealism. Because ideology is very important, not only here, but also in the evil capitalist society.
What will happen if you slip into the mud of idealism? One sin is to marry "feudal superstition". Superstition and idealism are mutually causal and collude with each other, which is harmful to people. This brings us to the other half of the topic: superstition. My understanding of "superstition" is fascination with a theory, phenomenon, etc. , bigotry, partiality, completely lost their ability to analyze and judge. We preach that materialism is a magic weapon that can solve all problems. However, is it true? If we believe it completely, can it also be regarded as "superstition"? We should also talk about "materialism" when dealing with materialism.