Exceptions, examples, cases, conventions, conventions, examples, precedents, aid cases, cases, decrees, examples, general rules, conventions, examples, examples, examples, conventions, regulations, proportions, precedents, examples, examples, examples.

Debate skills:

1, "Make the finishing point" method (meaning analysis method) ("dragon" as an example, "eye" as an argument)

The finishing touch method is also called inductive sublimation method, that is, it summarizes the * * * nature of an argument with individual characteristics in critical language, and it is an analytical method to reveal the essence of things through the phenomena provided by the argument.

Specifically, it is to analyze the cited cases from many aspects and angles, or to dig and summarize from a small point of view to a big point, to abstract the meaning of the event or behavior, to reveal the value, influence or harm of the event or behavior, to point out the truth contained in the argument, and to reveal the logical relationship between the arguments, so as to highlight the essential significance of the case and make the argument more thorough and clear.

2. Hypothesis reverse inference method (reverse hypothesis method)

Hypothetical reverse reasoning is to put forward some assumptions after listing factual arguments, change the conditions of things, and analyze the changes of results. By deducing and comparing the relationship between conditions and results, we emphasize the inevitable result of things under specific conditions, and then achieve the purpose of demonstration.

3. Root-seeking method (causal analysis)

Root-seeking method is to analyze the cause or result of the things in the argument after enumerating the factual arguments: either from the cause and the cause, explore the source and reveal the essence; Or lead, infer, and draw conclusions. It can be divided into direct causes and self-questioning and self-answering.

4, doubt guiding thinking method

Although some factual arguments are easy to understand, they can demonstrate their views more concretely and fully. This kind of cases can be developed by asking questions and guiding thinking, and expressed by asking questions in the comparison between cases and reality, so as to arouse readers' admiration and in-depth thinking.

5, positive and negative contrast method

There are two kinds of positive and negative contrast: one is to put forward two examples of one positive and one negative, and they need to be further analyzed. One is to give only one example, which has both positive and negative factors. The author makes a comparative analysis from both positive and negative aspects, focusing on analysis rather than giving examples.