In order to write an argumentative essay quickly, it is very important to master the writing skills of argumentative essay. The following is a summary of my writing skills in my years of teaching: 1. Master the three elements of argumentative writing: argument and argument (what to prove). Argument is what the author wants to discuss and elaborate, and propositions and opinions are complete and concise sentences in form. Judging from the full text, it will be able to control the full text. The form of expression is often a judgment sentence expressing affirmation or negation, and it is a clear statement sentence. Demonstrate (with what proof) the materials that prove the author's point of view. Type of argument: (1) factual materials, (2) theoretical materials. (1) As the factual material of the argument, it can be A. Specific cases B. Summarized facts C. Statistical data D. Personal experiences and feelings. (2) As theoretical materials for argument, it can be A. The classic works and wise sayings of predecessors B. Folk proverbs and sayings C. Scientific axioms, laws and so on. (3) Requirements for using arguments: ① certainty. We must choose those hard and typical facts. When citing theoretical materials that have been tested by practice as arguments, we must pay attention to the exact meaning of the cited theory itself. ② Typical. The cited examples should be widely representative, representing the general characteristics and properties of such things. (3) the unity of arguments and arguments. The argument is to prove the argument, so the two should be closely related. The process of proving (how to prove) an idea with materials.

Second, the demonstration method

Reasoning argument, example argument, contrast argument, quotation argument, metaphor argument.

Third, the way of argument.

Argumentation (a way of argument that actively proves the correctness of the author's own argument with sufficient arguments); Refute (to establish one's own correct argument by refuting a wrong or reactionary point of view) What is the wrong point of view that the author wants to refute when reading the paper (1)? (2) How does the author refute and apply those reasons and arguments; (3) From this, what is the correct view established by the author?

Fourth, common questions and answering skills

1. Function and format of analysis and demonstration methods: ①. Demonstration with examples: By citing specific examples, the demonstration will be more specific and convincing. Format: Use examples to demonstrate and cite … (summarize examples) to prove … (if there is a sub-argument, write the sub-argument it proves, otherwise write the central argument), thus making the argument more specific and convincing. (2) Reasoning argument: prove the argument through reasoning, making the argument more general and profound. Form: demonstrate the viewpoint with the method of rational argument ... so as to make the argument more universal and deeper. 3. Metaphorical argument: use metaphor to prove and make the argument vivid and easy to understand. Format: Metaphorical argument is a comparative argument for comparison; the function of comparative argument is to highlight. Format: Compare … with … by means of comparative argument, and highlight the viewpoint of …. ⑤ Citation arguments: Citation arguments are complicated and related to the specific cited materials, such as quoting famous sayings, aphorisms, authoritative data, anecdotes of celebrities, jokes and anecdotes. , its role should be analyzed in detail. For example, quoting famous sayings, aphorisms and authoritative data can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; Citing celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to continue reading. Format: Use the argument method of quoting arguments, and quote … to prove the viewpoint of … to make the argument more convincing. (or more interesting, to attract readers to continue reading)

2. Type and function of analysis and argumentation: Argumentation can be divided into two types: truth argumentation and fact argumentation. There are two key points in answering questions: (1), defining the type of argument; (2) Specific analysis. The standard answer format is as follows: this is an argument, which plays the role of proof (argument, if there is a sub-argument, write the sub-argument it proves, otherwise write the central argument. )

The way the article puts forward the central argument is: (1), and the title, beginning and end of the article point out the central argument. (2) Put forward the central argument with a connecting sentence in the middle of the article. (3)? Summarize the central sentence of each paragraph and summarize the central argument.

4. Analysis of article argumentation: First of all, we should understand the structure of general argumentative papers: asking questions (introduction)-analyzing questions (papers)-solving problems (conclusions). In fact, analyzing the argumentation idea of argumentative essays is to add some words such as "first", "then", "then" and "last" on the basis of paragraph level. When you do this topic, you should pay special attention to the opening and closing sentences.

The content at the beginning is: (1), putting forward the central argument; (2), lead to the topic; In the above two aspects, we should specifically answer the specific ways to put forward the central argument or lead to the topic, some through celebrity quotes, some through celebrity anecdotes, and some through anecdotes and jokes.

The final content: (1), deepen the central argument and put forward the conclusion of …; (2) Repeating or strengthening the central argument ...; (3) Appeal ... or exhort people ...; (4) Supplementary argumentation.

5. Understand the characteristics of argumentative language: generality, rigor and dialectics.

6. Analysis of the characteristics of argumentative writing: The characteristics of argumentative writing can be analyzed from rhetorical devices, argumentation methods, writing skills (1), rhetoric and other angles: if metaphors are used, they can be combined with the characteristics of metaphors, that is, vivid images; For example, parallelism enhances the momentum of the article argument; For example, quoting ancient poetry makes the article rich in literary talent. (2) Demonstration method: refers to the function of demonstration method. (3) Writing techniques are relatively fixed, and the common ones are: , examples and reasons (narrative and discussion); ? The demonstration method ... is the main method. Similarly, doing this kind of topic must be supported by specific sentences, that is, using specific examples in the article as examples of analysis.

7. The function of paragraph structure: (1), leading out (all) below; (2) Summarize the first (full) articles; (3) connecting the preceding with the following. For example, the opening paragraph often leads to the central argument (topic): ① At the beginning, the central argument is put forward by writing an example of … (or leading to …). (2) At the beginning, by quoting famous sayings, put forward the central argument … (or lead to the topic of …). (3) At the beginning, by quoting interesting stories of famous people (or …) to put forward the central argument … (or leading out …) also played a role in attracting readers to read and enhancing the interest of discussion.

In a word, I think that mastering the skills of argumentative writing in a short time and writing argumentative writing quickly are problems that our teachers should explore and solve in depth. The above opinions are willing to share with you.