2
Choose "friends" instead of "enemies" in the same or similar fields. For example, foreign cooperation units in the past, or friends made at international conferences.
three
From the reference point of view, this is the simplest but not the best method.
four
Although the editorial department has no specific requirements for the titles of reviewers, it is best to choose people above associate professor. The editorial department requires you to provide the names of reviewers, as well as their work units, faxes and emails. Among them, the email requirements must be correctly available, because the editorial department mainly communicates with your reviewers by email. It seems that reviewers must be recommended, otherwise the submission process cannot be carried out; There are also self-recommendation, but it is not necessarily used, and the number of self-recommendation in the same country outside Europe and America is limited, or the edtioral team arranges it by itself, but the latter takes a long time and lacks maneuverability.
end
Matters needing attention
1. Invite foreign acquaintances or friends to make a review. It can be your own, it can also be known by colleagues or friends, and you can tell each other in advance. The possibility of direct rejection is greatly reduced, and the worst is usually retrial after overhaul, and the final "rejection record" is left to it. Thesis overhaul, adhere to a sincere and serious revision before you can be hired. It should be noted that the review period of the paper is precious, so don't refuse it at will.
2. Invite Daniel in the research field to review the manuscript. Daniel usually doesn't just care about details such as grammar or format of papers. He will often read your papers, and as long as there are small innovations or gratifying conclusions, he will let your papers pass, because Daniel is generally fond of talents. Of course, you'd better show in your article that you know your research field well, and don't be pointed out with obvious mistakes. Rest assured! Daniel can generally see your "innovation" by browsing the papers, otherwise how can you be called Daniel? !
Don't forget to invite third world countries. I was flattered when I was invited for the first time. After reading the manuscript (the author is Israeli), I feel that the discussion lacks originality and the concrete realization of advanced technology, and I want to refuse it; But is it too cruel to reflect? At the same time, the end of the world is reduced to people, so why not enjoy the beauty of adults? So I judged it as "revised and published", and attached the concrete realization of advanced technology to be supplemented in detail in my opinion. Soon I read the officially published article revised according to my opinion. Looking for a reviewer from a third world country. Will it be pleasing? Maybe. By the way, this is a judge who is not of your nationality.
3. Recommend an editorial board whose contribution is similar to yours as a reviewer. If the representative work-related papers to be recommended by reviewers are properly cited, and the previous contributions are fully affirmed or properly boosted, it is estimated that it is difficult to directly reject the papers.