2000 words 1
At present, the international situation is undergoing profound changes, and various complex uncertainties and non-traditional factors are differentiated and deduced, which puts forward new topics for China's national development and foreign exchanges. In this case, it is particularly important to recognize the situation and clarify the goals and ideas. Although the complexity and variability of the world situation are increasing, peace and development are still the themes of today's times.
Keywords: international situation; Diplomacy; Cooperation; * * * Homomorphism
Let's put aside ideological opposition and talk about the game of national interests. China is currently on the defensive, while countries like Japan and the United States are on the offensive. They regard China as the biggest challenger to the future international status. It is precisely because of the rapid development of China's economy in recent years that it has attracted worldwide attention and become a real world power in the 2 1 century that they are staring at the rise of China with double vigilance!
As far as ideology and social system are concerned, China is still in a transitional period, which is equivalent to 50 years behind the advanced mainstream of the world. However, once this gradually formed and improved social system collapses, it will inevitably lead to frequent turmoil and people's livelihood. In the early days of reform and opening up, China kept a low profile, but in the current situation, it has turned to take the initiative to break through.
1 1, in early 2006, dozens of China-Africa forums held in Beijing witnessed China's international development strategy: it is a foreign policy that keeps pace with the new era and pursues foreign cooperation.
For China at present, the biggest international problems are Taiwan Province Province and North Korea. The situation in the Taiwan Strait is related to the world pattern, involving China, the United States, Japan and Russia, and is also the key to China's peaceful reunification. There is no doubt that the United States and Japan have great opposition and resistance to the return of China and Taiwan Province Province, and they and Taiwan Province Province.
The origin is quite deep. As far as the current situation is concerned, everyone is observing each other's actions in order to wait for an opportunity to take the initiative. It is China and Japan that are entangled in the East China Sea issue. In addition, the "ghost worship" of Japanese leaders often caused the pain left by the massacre of China people. So, do the Japanese now trust that Prime Minister Abe will stop visiting the "shrine" as promised, and do they have any intention to mend fences with China? Can China and Japan really cooperate to develop East China Sea energy? Under the favorable development trend, will the Japanese still interfere in Taiwan Province Province? None of us know, but it remains to be seen.
Of course, there is the United States, which has been the "big brother" of Taiwan Province Province for many years. I don't think it even knows whether it will give up, or what strange intervention measures it will take, and what kind of support it will give to the "hegemony" of Taiwan Province Province. Because this is an era of mutual restraint, no one wants to endanger the overall situation for the sake of the local, let alone lose a reputation that will damage prestige in the world.
The final outcome of the DPRK nuclear issue will depend on the reunion of China, the United States, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the DPRK. China, on the other hand, has many worries about the North Korean nuclear issue, so it is difficult to be "detached" from the standpoint like the United States. For more than 50 years, North Korea has never betrayed China at least on the principle of its relations with the United States, Japan and Taiwan Province Province. No matter what the internal affairs of North Korea are, China cannot remain neutral in the international arena, but must stand on the side of North Korea, a "love-hate guy".
On the other hand, under the overall situation of the world, the United States and China are both big countries. As responsible and interested participants in the international system, their goal should be more ambitious: * * to cooperate with each other and maintain a world system conducive to long-term peace and prosperity in the world. The relationship between the United States and China is a "close and complicated" issue.
Perhaps, at some point, the United States will come up with some restless ways to "contain" and "balance" China. For example, not long ago, the United States lobbied South Korea and Japan to join NATO, and before that, the United States also persuaded Australia. Isn't this all about getting close to China and Russia in order to expand their "hegemony"?
However, the current Sino-Russian relationship is only limited to the extremely superficial and fragile level of "mutual demand", which hides deep risks. The deep risk is that with the successive rise of the two countries, bilateral relations may face a "change" pattern again. However, when dealing with the "containment" of the "NATO" led by the United States, China and Russia will undoubtedly be "strong outside and hollow inside."
While the seemingly close relationship between the United States and European countries is gradually drifting away, it is also unconsciously approaching China, and the European aid policy to China is the best example. They hope that China will change, but they should not go too far to avoid social unrest. Social stability has stabilized Europeans' fantasy of China's big market. Therefore, they are very concerned about social stability and political stability in China. If China's reform is unstable and causes social unrest, all the investments may be ruined. And maintaining social stability is the direction of China's current efforts, and China and Europe will certainly move towards a good trend in future cooperation!
References:
[1] Liu Guoguang, editor-in-chief, Research on China's Economic Development Strategy, Shanghai People's Publishing House, 20 13.
[2] Tan Chongtai et al. Development Economics, Shanghai People's Publishing House, 20 12.
[3] New Development Economics, edited by Zhang, Henan People's Publishing House, 20 1 1.
[4] Yang Introduction to Economic Geography, East China Normal University Press, 2007.
Example annotation
Let the world change for you (56 points)
Don't let the darkness that devours the world bury your ideal, because the only value of your existence is to l