202 1,11On October 27th, the Ministry of Education and other six departments issued the Guiding Opinions on Strengthening the Construction and Reform of College Teachers in the New Era. This opinion emphasizes that in the income distribution of teachers in colleges and universities, the number of papers, patents, projects, project funds and other scientific research quantitative indicators can not be directly linked to the distribution and reward of teachers' performance pay. Once this guidance was published, it attracted a heated discussion among teachers. Obviously, this kind of guidance is to prevent university teachers from trying? Publish a paper. Publish a paper? The phenomenon that teaching environment returns to education itself. But can this guidance really change the status quo?

Only emphasizing the indicators of the paper is really not conducive to the teaching environment. In the past, the salaries of many teachers in colleges and universities were linked to the number of papers, and often more papers were issued, and the performance salary would be high. This has also led some teachers not to concentrate on teaching and spend more time on their own papers. After all, this is related to your income.

However, due to their own ability and time problems, many university teachers even risked plagiarism to increase the number of papers, which also set a bad image for college students.

Obviously, only emphasizing the performance appraisal of the number of papers is very unfavorable to the current teaching environment in colleges and universities.

Cancel the paper index, teachers' income will have an impact. Because teachers' performance pay will be linked to the number of papers, teachers' income will have a great relationship with the number of papers. Once this indicator is cancelled, it will inevitably affect the salaries of some teachers.

If the salaries of some teachers are reduced, there will naturally be a certain psychological gap in teaching, so it is also very unfavorable to the teaching environment. However, it is impossible for colleges and universities to complete the salary system of school teachers in a short time, so teachers may be in an awkward position during this period.

The opinion did not point out how to establish the salary system in colleges and universities. Although the opinion exposes the disadvantages of the current number of teaching papers in colleges and universities, it does not tell colleges and universities how to establish their own teacher salary system.

After all, it is impossible for the Ministry of Education to unify the salary system of all colleges and universities in China, and it is also difficult to unify it because of different places. Therefore, it is still the university's own business to formulate the salary system.

How to establish teachers' salary system has become a difficult problem for colleges and universities. On the basis of the opinions of the Ministry of Education, colleges and universities should formulate their own teacher salary system according to the actual situation of their own schools, ensure that teachers' salaries are not affected, actively encourage teachers to participate in teaching work, and bring the school's educational environment back to the most essential educational and scientific research environment!