B. On the basis of fully grasping the theme of the film, I put forward my own point of view, which is the argument of film criticism, and will be discussed around this argument below. The central argument of film criticism can follow a certain paradigm: what kind of story the film tells, what kind of phenomenon it reflects or what kind of views it expresses. You can set a main title to directly summarize your own arguments; Subtitles can also be set outside the main title. The main title is a summary of the argument, and the subtitle indicates the discussion angle or explanation. Generally speaking, film reviews have subtitles.
C. comment on the main part of the article. In this part, the arguments put forward should be fully discussed. In the discussion, each part of the argument should be regarded as a relatively independent and complete essay, that is, this part of the argument should be put forward first, which is also a branch of the general argument. Then, we should set up an argument and prove it with the most convincing materials in the film. Then, it is necessary to demonstrate. It is necessary to analyze the general argument layer by layer. The discussion should be based on the general argument of the article, aiming at a clear and thorough analysis of the general argument. Based on the general argument, we can find the breakthrough point, distinguish and set different levels, and present a progressive trend. Then, the commentator can discuss at different levels, each level should be regarded as a relatively complete and independent part, and each level should have arguments, and arguments should be set and demonstrated. The requirements of its arguments, arguments and argumentation are similar to those of analytical method.
D. The synthesis after analysis not only presents the condensation and generalization of various theories, but also draws new conclusions on this basis. This conclusion should not only echo and coincide with the general argument of the article, but also deepen and improve on the basis of the former. Or the commentator can also trigger it, draw richer and deeper derivative meanings, and make people get more enlightenment. The conclusion after deduction is not only a profile of the topic, but also a response to the general argument of the article. The level of deductive writing is progressive, and the final level may be the conclusion. It can also be deepened and perfected after the derivation is completed, and richer and deeper derivation significance can be obtained, which can be mastered by the theorists according to their needs.
E font should be written neatly and clearly, leaving a good impression on the marking teacher and trying to avoid typos. If you still have time to finish writing, check it carefully again for typos and unreasonable sentences, and then revise it. It is recommended not to make a big change in the whole paragraph.