Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - About "Is the active attack theory correct?"
About "Is the active attack theory correct?"
wrong

The first imperialist invasion was an unjust war and naked plunder. Therefore, no matter what excuse is used to cover it up, it cannot be said that his aggression is meritorious. He's just a Crime Games.

Secondly, imperialism has brought us great disasters in China. No matter from which aspect, China has indeed suffered huge losses, and the positive impact is far from offsetting the negative impact.

Secondly, judging from the historical development of China, as early as the Ming Dynasty, China had already bred the seeds of capitalism itself, but the imperialist invasion strangled it in the cradle.

Looking back at history, the imperialist powers opened the door of China with the brute force of artillery, although it accelerated the decline of feudalism and stimulated the development of capitalism to a certain extent. However, just because you see this, you can't say that imperialist aggression is meritorious! Our painful price: military aggression, cultural infiltration and economic plunder by big countries.