Law thesis, legal history, on the establishment of the principle of judicial independence in the late Qing Dynasty, the topic is off-topic, is it difficult to reply? The constitution teacher is in the defense group. What will he ask? Legal history is the foundation of all jurisprudence, just like jurisprudence, so it goes without saying that even a constitutional law teacher will not only ask questions about the constitution, but also ask you about the center and content of your thesis. I also study law. Although I haven't read your paper, from the topic of your paper "On the Establishment of the Principle of Judicial Independence in the Late Qing Dynasty", I think this paper may involve several core issues:

1. What is the background of the establishment of this principle of judicial independence?

2. What is the progressive significance of judicial independence?

3. What is the derivative relationship between the establishment of the principle of judicial independence in the late Qing Dynasty and judicial independence in today's era, and what are the differences and connections between them?

4. What effect does the establishment of this principle have on the establishment of constitutional system in later generations?

The above questions are also some I think that in writing this paper, besides discussing the historical background, context and comparative law of the principle of judicial independence, we should also focus on several issues. If these problems are mentioned in your paper, please pay attention. Answer the teacher's questions when you reply. If you know, please try your best to answer them. If you don't know or haven't thought about it, I hope you can think about it immediately, quickly combine your own papers and make an appropriate answer. On the one hand, don't let the teacher think that you don't understand this at all. On the other hand, you should frankly say that your research is not deep enough, and you will continue to study in the future to show your cautious research attitude. One problem in the defense should not be to compete with professional teachers and be opinionated. Encounter teachers' problems, especially when professional teachers ask professional questions. If you think it is contrary to your point of view, please answer conservatively, and try to link the teacher's point of view with your paper, saying that it is consistent, or that the teacher's point of view is your deepening, but it can't be said to be contrary, completely opposite. Negative If your point of view is wrong, it will directly lead to the negative value of the paper.