Those who have heard of writing articles in ancient times must be based on classics and rooted in truth. Ji Zhi expresses biographical order and praise, each with its own style. Will not be confused, illegible. Why does he imitate others when he speaks? People today are not rooted in classics and truth, but have been handed down from the contention of a hundred schools of thought. Because their argument is small rather than big, how can they compare with the ancients? Lao Su's articles are full of twists and turns, gloomy and sharp, almost unparalleled, but knowledgeable people still laugh at him, because his arguments can't all conform to the way of saints. There is no talent of Su Gong now, and his tone is much more tolerant than Su Gong's. How can we expect his speech to be established without being refuted?

The ancients used soldiers, gathered and dispersed to advance and retreat, and made a surprise victory. It is impossible to estimate the speed change like a god. As for the way he deployed the team and arranged the formation, he did nothing. Writing an article without discipline is like leading an army without military orders. Ancient papers must also set up a system, and then make the article neat. Just like carpenters, they are all pillars and rafters. Although they are not far apart, the residence of adults in the palace is also the place where they worship immortals and work. At home. They are different. If there is no difference between "recording" and "preface", just like the homes of ordinary people and temples dedicated to immortals, is that ok? Casting a sword is the same as a knife, but it can't be; Being a car is the same as being a boat. Is it still twisted and narrow?

Fifty-six a great man turned it over.