1, repeat introduction:

Repeated publication refers to the phenomenon that when the author submits a manuscript in different publications, the contents of his manuscript, such as hypothetical methods, samples, data, charts, arguments, conclusions, etc., are quite repetitive, and there is not enough cross-reference or index between manuscripts.

There are two different roles involved here. The other is the act of publishing other people's works or achievements with or without modification. The latter is a typical plagiarism.

2, the consequences of repeated publication:

Will affect the relationship between the author and the staff. Employees may have doubts about the author's ability to work, and may think that the author has copied the contents of other people's papers. This may damage the author's reputation and may have a negative impact on the original work.

Will have a long-term impact on the author's career. The author's paper may not be submitted to other journals, which means that the author's research activities in this field will be restricted. In addition, the author may be forbidden to copy other people's papers, which makes the author's research activities more challenging.

Types of academic misconduct of editors;

1. publishing editorial comments in violation of academic and moral standards;

Putting forward editorial opinions that do not follow academic ethics standards and the purpose of journals should be defined as putting forward editorial opinions that violate academic ethics standards.

2. Violation of conflict of interest laws and regulations:

Concealing the interest relationship with the contributing author, or deliberately selecting peer reviewers who have an interest relationship with the contributing author, should be defined as violating the conflict of interest provisions. The forms of violating the conflict of interest regulations include: failing to explain to the editor the conflict of interest that may exclude him from the editing procedure of a specific manuscript.

3. Violation of confidentiality requirements:

Deliberately disclosing the relevant information of the author and reviewer in anonymous peer review, or disclosing, making public or using the edited manuscript without authorization, or disclosing the manuscript information because it does not conform to the relevant provisions, shall be defined as violating the confidentiality provisions.

4, misappropriation of manuscript content:

Unauthorized use of unpublished manuscript content, or permission to use unpublished manuscript content without quotation or explanation, should be defined as misappropriation of manuscript content.