Recently, I read a lot of self-media articles with high reading.

It is found that self-media articles are articles that export values, and often cite personal cases and statistical data to demonstrate their views.

But many times you will find that the evidence is not so sufficient.

Even in some cases, this is just a one-sided argument.

But it is such an article that can often cause * * *.

If you write a very rigorous article, it will be repeated and repeated, but no one will read it.

Another classic case is the global debate about global warming.

You will find that both sides can call many cases and a lot of data to support their views.

Therefore, for those who pursue perfectionism, it is not suitable to write articles from the media.

The rigor of self-media articles is several grades lower than that of academic articles.

The author needs to lower the requirement for evidence. Often a person's case, a celebrity's words, his own personal experience, hearsay stories, and a few words on the Internet can be used as arguments.

If you want to write a good article from the media, you must first make yourself more free and easy, more willful, and put aside those particularly rigorous ideas.

Self-media articles are relative to academic papers, just as Qipa's theory is relative to traditional debates.

I hope everyone can write good articles from the media and increase their own powder.

Come on together in the new year.