Reasonably set the conditions for papers and scientific research achievements in the evaluation of professional titles.

1, papers and scientific research achievements should reflect professional ability and academic level.

Thesis is one of the intuitive manifestations of professional ability and academic level, and it is reasonable to ask for it in the evaluation of professional titles. But for different majors and industries, the requirements for papers should be different.

In terms of scientific research achievements, besides papers, other forms of scientific research achievements can also be considered, such as scientific research projects, patents obtained and new products developed. These achievements should also be included in the scope of evaluation, so as to evaluate the applicant's professional ability and academic level more comprehensively.

2, consider the characteristics of the industry and work characteristics.

Different industry characteristics and job characteristics have different requirements for candidates. For example, for practical industries or positions, such as engineers and doctors, more attention should be paid to practical work ability and performance, rather than the number of papers.

In terms of scientific research achievements, we can consider the major projects that the applicant participated in and the national awards won, which can better reflect the applicant's practical work ability and contribution.

3, appropriately reduce the quantity requirements, pay attention to quality.

Although papers and scientific research achievements are important indicators to evaluate professional ability and academic level, quantity does not necessarily represent quality. Therefore, we should pay more attention to the quality of papers and scientific research achievements in the evaluation of professional titles, and appropriately reduce the quantity requirements.

In terms of papers, we can pay more attention to quality indicators such as impact factors and cited times, rather than simply looking at the number of papers. In terms of scientific research results, we can pay more attention to the innovation, practicality and social influence of the results, rather than just looking at the number of results.

Problems needing attention in the evaluation of professional titles

1 for review policies and standards.

Before the professional title evaluation, the applicant needs to know the evaluation policies and standards, so as to better prepare the application materials and deal with various problems in the evaluation. There may be differences in professional title evaluation policies and standards in different industries and regions. Applicants need to read the relevant documents and notices carefully to ensure that they meet the evaluation requirements.

2. Prepare sufficient materials

To declare a professional title, you need to submit a series of materials, including personal basic information, work experience, achievement awards, academic papers, etc. Applicants need to carefully prepare these materials to ensure that the contents are true, accurate and complete. Before submitting materials, applicants need to conduct a comprehensive review of their own materials to ensure that there are no omissions and errors.

3. Pay attention to defensive skills

In the evaluation of professional titles, the applicant may need to participate in the defense session. The defense is an important opportunity to show their working ability and professional level, and applicants need to prepare carefully. In the process of defense, the applicant needs to pay attention to manners, express clearly and be logical. At the same time, the applicant also needs to make reasonable answers according to the judges' questions to avoid contradictions and loopholes.