Argumentative thinking refers to what the author does to prove a point.

Among them, the author has done the following 12:

1. At the beginning, see if the author has achieved these three points:

(1) Make an argument: Have you made any comments? What have you made?

(2) Propose sub-arguments: Did the author propose several sub-arguments, and indirectly demonstrate the central argument by directly demonstrating the sub-arguments?

(3) Turning: Does the author use turning sentences to lead to arguments?

2. The main part depends on whether the author has achieved these six points:

(1) Choose an argument: What to quote and what to use as an argument?

(2) Determine the argumentation method: What argumentation method should be used?

(3) Choose the angle of exposition: from which angle (front or back)?

(4) In-depth analysis and reinforcement argument: Did the author analyze the argument after citing the factual argument?

(5) Adding metaphor argument: On the basis of example argument and reason argument, does the author use metaphor argument to explain the point of view of the article?

(6) Additional reasoning: On the basis of examples and reasoning, did the author demonstrate his point of view again by reasoning?

3. Finally, see if the author has achieved these three points:

(1) Eliminate misunderstanding: Did the author emphasize anything before summing up, so as to avoid readers' misunderstanding and ensure the rigor of argument logic.

(2) General summary: Has the author made a general summary of the previous arguments?

(3) Draw a conclusion: What conclusion did the author draw or what initiative or warning did he give?

Answer format: What did the author do to prove a point? Its language expression is: the author first ... then ... then ... then ... then ... then ... finally, he comes to a conclusion. The more complicated the demonstration process is, the more steps there are, and the more words are used.