First, try to give people the first impression that the language is concise and the thinking is clear.
After entering the defense site, the moderator first informed the respondent that the total defense time is 25 minutes (of course, there may be small differences in the mastery of defense time in different places), and then asked the respondent to briefly introduce himself and summarize the main contents of the defense paper submitted (the time is limited to 5 minutes). Many respondents should be calm when introducing themselves: my name is X X, I am now X X, graduated from XX University in XX factory (company), and obtained the title of economist in XX. The title of my defense thesis is. This paper mainly expounds the problems of …. Then concretize the problem or simply summarize it in the form of a subtitle, and it will be done in less than 5 minutes. This gave the defense review panel the first impression of "concise language and clear thinking". It laid a good foundation for the next formal defense.
However, quite a few interviewees were nervous and incoherent when introducing themselves, and some even panicked and incoherent, saying a lot of unnecessary words in self-introduction. The "brief description" of the paper is from the back to the end. The host had to remind him to be brief one by one. When the time has exceeded 5 minutes, for some respondents, an abrupt stop is also called the best policy, although the meaning is still unfinished; Some respondents continued to speak, and some did not listen to the reminder for more than ten minutes. In this way, there is only ten minutes left for the formal defense. More importantly, the first impression given to the defense experts when they take the stage to defend has a great influence on the score of the whole defense.
Second, carefully examine the questions, calmly reply and discuss the problems closely.
After the opening remarks, the host asked four questions: one of them was a mandatory question; One of the other three is a multiple choice question. Respondents will begin to reply after determining the answer questions.
Mandatory issues are often closely related to the theme of the defense thesis submitted by the respondent.
Three, how to reflect the respondent's "talent" and "knowledge"
In the defense, I found that someone had prepared a lot of information and asked, "May I have a look at the reference materials?" ? The host agreed. However, even if we find the answer now, what is the image? If you follow the script, is it a defense?
"Knowledge is power" is an old saying, but for the respondents, knowledge comes first. If you want to be promoted to a senior economist and become a contemporary senior economic management talent in China, you can't afford to wear this crown without considerable knowledge. Determined to read thousands of books, from "reading"; Wan Li Road, from the Calendar (practice); This is "experience". A senior economist must combine theoretical knowledge with practical knowledge in books. Only in this way can the topic be selected accurately, thoroughly analyzed and the academic level be high.
To be fully prepared for basic exercises and defense, we must pay attention to the following aspects.
First of all, the theme of the paper should be clear. This should start with an accurate (correct) topic selection. Within three or two minutes of the "paper summary" at the beginning of the defense, you should clearly express the core of your paper in very organized and concise language: what did you write? Why write? What's the purpose? So that people's general views and intentions about your paper are clear, that is, the theme is clear.
The second is to be clear when answering questions. Whether it is a compulsory question or a multiple-choice question. Before replying, that is, when reviewing the questions, you should decide immediately: ① What is the main answer to this question? (2) I want to discuss it from several aspects; What's the difficulty? What language skills will I use to deal with them? In this way, you can have a well-thought-out plan and proceed with the confidence and elegance of the speaker. At this time, on the one hand, the host considers the accuracy of your answer to the question; Another 10,000 aspects examine your comprehensive analysis ability and language expression ability from your clear expression, which can be reflected from here.
Third, the examples should be concrete and the language vivid. For example, it should be specific to a certain unit in a certain place in a certain year and month. In short, the more specific, the better. The positive and negative effects should be illustrated by quantitative actual figures as much as possible, so as to be vivid and touching. A successful defense, in addition to theoretical exposition, should also have a philosophical summary. Philosophical, especially the use of famous sayings or allusions, can sometimes be placed at the beginning of the problem, sometimes at the end, and of course it can also run through. In any case, it should be used naturally and properly to make the finishing touch and leave a deep impression on the responsible experts. It goes without saying that this is an effective means to improve the score.
Fourth, the combination arrangement should be flexible. In the defense, the ability of language expression and adaptability are listed as the contents of investigation and marking, but they are often ignored by the respondent. I mistakenly think that I only need to answer, which is an important reason for losing points. The defense is basically a kind of "dynamic" art, so there should be some flexibility in the use of language, the combination of theories and the arrangement of defense.
The fifth is to pay attention to your manners. In this regard, some successful people have a deep understanding: this is called defense plus points and impression plus points. There is some truth in this statement. Foreign countries have requirements for dress, appearance, behavior and posture, and mental state when defending. It is precisely because our country has no clear requirements in this regard that it is easy to be ignored. Some people are disheveled, untidy and careless. Although it is not the main reason for lowering the score, it is often easily influenced unconsciously because of a bad impression.
The process of defense is an activity that focuses on showing the knowledge and knowledge of the respondent. Defense itself is a kind of flowing knowledge, which needs to develop with the change. It needs a complete theoretical framework and appropriate witty expression. Defense is a kind of knowledge, but also a skill and ability. For example, from the outside to the inside, from right to wrong; Analogy, reasoning, response, clever suggestions, strategies and intelligent answers; One word invites pets, seven steps become poems, clever words save sins, and the implication; Proper use of knowledge and skills such as nonsense, tit-for-tat, clever story borrowing, laughing and answering questions can add luster to your defense, which is undoubtedly a good auxiliary means to improve your score.