Xu Zhongmin, Northwest Institute of Ecological Environment and Resources, China Academy of Sciences, published the paper "Theory and Practice of Comprehensive Framework of Ecological Economics of Glacier and Frozen Soil" on October 3rd, which aroused people's concern and heated discussion about the falsification of academic papers, and also made people feel that serious academic papers can be used to flatter.
65438+1October 12 Under the pressure of public opinion, Glacier Frozen Soil issued a retraction statement, saying that the review was not strict before publication and apologized to the public. Xu Zhongmin's tutor also said that these two articles were published without prior knowledge, and he has resigned. The Northwest Institute of Eco-environment and Resources of China Academy of Sciences issued the Notes on Improper Handling, which initiated the rectification of the editorial board and editorial department of the journal.
Amid the turbulent public opinion, Voice of Chinese Academy of Sciences issued two blog posts in the middle of the night of June 5438+1October 12, responding to the improper publication of Glacier Frozen Soil: the papers did not conform to the academic orientation of the journal, and the academic control of the editorial department of the journal was not strict. It accepted the resignation of the editor-in-chief and suspended the post of full-time deputy editor-in-chief An investigation team will be set up as soon as possible to seriously investigate related issues.
In this purely academic paper, Xu Zhong devoted a lot of space to describing it? The noble feeling of the tutor and the graceful feeling of the teacher's mother? . It seems understandable to flatter and praise the tutor and the teacher's mother, but this paper is one of the achievements of the National Natural Science Foundation and won 2 million yuan. Xu Zhongmin obviously used it in the wrong place.
The first part of this paper is divided into? Beauty and the lofty sense of Taoist teachers, the beautiful sense of teachers and mothers, the beauty of life and the avenue of life? And then what? Conclusion? Chapter five, how many times has Xu Zhongmin discussed it? The noble feeling of the tutor and the graceful feeling of the teacher's mother? . Where is this an academic paper? Pure flattery.
After someone broke the news, this paper is a key project of the Natural Science Foundation? Study on Ecological-Hydrological Process Integration in Heihe River Basin? One of the achievements of this book is led by Xu Zhongmin, and the funding amount of this project is 2 million yuan.
In an interview, Xu Zhongmin denied that this paper was written in? Kiss the tutor's ass? Still say? That article is meaningful and supported by high-level research papers? .
Of course, Xu Zhongmin was investigated and severely punished. According to the decision of handling misconduct cases investigated and dealt with by the National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2020 (the first batch), Xu Zhongmin of Northwest Institute of Ecological Environment and Resources of China Academy of Sciences is in? Study on Ecological-Hydrological Process Integration in Heihe River Basin? (approval number: 9 1 1250 19) In the application, the identity information of many participants is inconsistent with the identity information marked in their published papers.
The Supervision Committee of the Natural Science Foundation of China said that Xu Zhongmin provided a lot of false information in the project application.
According to Article 16 (2) of the Measures for Handling Misbehavior of Science Fund Funding of the Supervision Committee of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Trial), the key support projects of 201major research projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China are cancelled? Study on Ecological-Hydrological Process Integration in Heihe River Basin? , to recover the allocated funds. Xu Zhong citizen was disqualified from applying for the National Natural Science Foundation project for 2 years (from July 7, 2020 to July 6, 2022) and was awarded to informed criticism, Xu Zhongmin.
In addition, the Northwest Institute of Ecological Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, was responsible for neglecting the supervision of the above problems, and gave it to informed criticism.