The key to writing a good film analysis article lies in whether the genre of the article can be accurately grasped. The most common mistake made by candidates is improper examination of questions, which does not meet the requirements of the examination at all and the genre is inappropriate. Write it down as a feeling of experience and review. In this way, even if the article is very literary, even if you "feel good about yourself", the score will not be very high. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the difference between the feelings after watching the movie and the film analysis. First, the genre of the article is different. Feedback, experience and other articles, basically belong to the category of lyric articles, with strong lyric color; Secondly, film analysis is a kind of literary criticism, which belongs to the category of argumentative essays and has a strong theoretical color. The former focuses on feelings, while the latter focuses on discussion. The former often contains emotional sentences, such as "I am very moved after reading this work", "I am very angry" and "I am full of feelings". The latter, on the other hand, is indifferent, and generally adopts various discussion means to discuss and analyze, without pursuing emotion and "literary talent".
Secondly, the identity of the author is different. When writing a review, the author is an ordinary audience; But when writing the movie viewing analysis, the author's identity has become a "commentator" and an "insider", at least he should be a "quasi-TV person" who may enter the TV industry in the near future.
Again, different goals. The feedback is aimed at "this matter", that is, the work content; Second, film analysis is aimed at "this film", that is, the work itself. The question answered by the former is: How do you feel after knowing this? What does this give you? The latter answered this question, how to understand this work? What are the more successful places?
Finally, the emphasis of the article is different. The feeling of review focuses on the ideological and educational significance of the work; Viewing analysis focuses on the creative experience of works, including artistic forms. The former requires sticking to the theme and expressing feelings in connection with reality; The latter requires closely tracking the creative characteristics, analyzing its expression effect and how its form serves the content. Second, the paper should have a framework.
After making it clear that film analysis is an argumentative paper, the next step is to find the layout of the paper. Frequently asked questions are as follows.
1, the full text is only one paragraph. Some people don't have the concept of paragraphs at all, and they don't divide paragraphs. They often write whenever they want, ramble, jump their minds and scratch their beards and eyebrows. Of course, this is unacceptable.
2. "Implication", or "appreciation". It usually starts with the first shot of a TV movie, followed by the second and third shots ... and makes some comments while narrating the content, which is also called "narrative discussion". This is like a Chinese teacher telling a text, reading a paragraph and telling a paragraph. This kind of writing lacks macro exercise, does not form small arguments, does not rise to theory, does not summarize, and does not meet the requirements. Another consequence is that there are too many narratives and too few discussions, and they are often top-heavy, wordy at the beginning and hasty at the end.
3. "Essay style". This often happens to students who are good at writing. They don't conform to the general routine of argumentative writing, which they call "rules and regulations" and "eight-part essay" They really want to show their literary talent, so they write literary papers, that is, essays. Of course, it is not excluded that a few top students can write excellent compositions, but they are generally not used in exams.
Correct writing should follow the general framework of argumentative writing, which consists of three parts: argument, argument and conclusion.
The beginning is the question, which is the argument part. There should be two meanings. First, make a brief introduction to the object of analysis (that is, this work): what's its name (title), who is the author (filmed by that station), what genre (column) it belongs to, what to say, what theme to express, etc. The second is to make an overall evaluation of this work, that is, to put forward the central argument of the whole paper, such as "this film is very successful" and so on.
The middle is the subject, which is the part of questioning and argumentation. It is necessary to analyze the success of this film and what creative experience it has. It is suggested to talk about at least three aspects (or characteristics) of posts and telecommunications, write a short paragraph in each aspect and extract a comment (that is, a small argument) in each aspect. Small arguments should be incisive, neat and eye-catching, and the best summary sentences should be neat. In order to highlight small points, it should be placed at the beginning of each small paragraph, or changed into a thick inscription layout, or saved as a subtitle. You can also add "first, second, third" or "first, second, third" or use parallelism. After that, I made an analysis around this little argument, "put facts and be reasonable." It is necessary to combine the content of the film, give specific examples, describe the discussion, and analyze the expression effect while describing the relevant plot or shot to prove the correctness of your point of view. There are two tendencies to be prevented here. First, the simple narrative content has become storytelling. Second, it's just talk, or empty lyricism, without combining specific content, completely out of touch with the work, air to air, that won't do either. Please note that this part is the main body of the article and determines the level of the article. The length should represent most of the full text, and it will not work if it is short.
Finally, the conclusion is the method to solve the problem, which is the conclusion part. This part is very short, mainly to summarize the full text, or point out its shortcomings, or raise hopes, or supplement explanations, or take care of the beginning. With this part, the article has a beginning and an end, intact, forming a climax, leaving a deep impression.