Generally speaking, papers are rejected for the following reasons: 10:
1. There is nothing new in the paper: original works are the most popular in international publications. Experimental argumentation is to repeat other people's published literature, or it can be inferred from known international literature through simple reasoning, or it is often rejected to repeat other people's work.
2. Analysis is not in place: there are new discoveries, but they have not been well refined and sublimated, and have risen to the height of theory. There is only a simple qualitative description, lacking quantitative and theoretical analysis.
3. Insufficient content: Different magazines have different requirements on the importance of the content of the paper. The paper should be an area of interest to the magazine and can arouse the interest of readers.
4. The reason is not sufficient: the argument put forward in this paper cannot be confirmed by this experimental scheme. There is something wrong with logical reasoning and lack of experimental methodology theory. The author failed to draw a conclusion from his experimental results fairly and objectively.
5. Imperfect experiment: there are serious defects in data or analysis. The experimental data is too small, and the molecular cell in vivo experiment n >；; 3. In vivo experiments of organs and animals. 6. Repeat n>3. The experimental conditions are not well controlled or there is no control group.
6. Improper statistical processing of data: the statistical test method and statistical analysis method of data are incorrect or inappropriate.
7. Narrow scope of application: only partial work, not general work that can be extended to other places, or just the application of foreign methods in a certain area of China, rather than proposing new methods.
8. Language description problem: There are too many grammatical errors in English and improper expression. The paper is poorly organized and poorly written, which makes it difficult for foreign reviewers to understand.
9. Magazine quality requirements: the data expression of the paper does not meet the quality requirements of the magazine, mainly including whether the pictures are clearly attached, whether the illustrations are complete, and whether the reference format meets the requirements.
10, Language Description Problem: There are too many grammatical errors in English, which are not properly expressed. The paper is poorly organized and poorly written, which makes it difficult for foreign reviewers to understand.
After understanding the reasons for the rejection of the paper, the next thing to do is to modify the paper according to the reasons for rejection. Generally speaking, you can take the following four steps to modify the paper:
The first step is about the structure of the article. To adjust the structure of the article, the structure should be clear, but the original structure of the article should be respected, otherwise it may become more and more chaotic.
The second step is the data about the article. In order to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of the data, we should delete those vague data and cases appropriately. If the data is insufficient, you need to find relevant data to supplement it.
The third step is to integrate and revise the materials of the paper again. Get rid of the rough and the fine, get rid of the false and keep the true. Integrate the cited materials so that they can concisely and accurately support the viewpoints of the paper. Views that cannot support the article should be deleted drastically, otherwise the paper will be lengthy. For articles with insufficient evidence, we should look for sufficient proof materials again. Be sure to ensure the authenticity of quoted data and famous sayings.
The fourth step is about language barriers. Because the general thesis is very academic, it needs to be expressed accurately in language expression, and at the same time, it must ensure that the sentences are not wrong. If the paper is submitted to a foreign journal, it is necessary to modify the translated sentences, at least in line with the expression habits of foreign languages, to avoid grammatical errors and spelling mistakes. Reviewers usually comment on our papers, but in any case, we can't change the original central argument of the paper. On the whole, the context of expression should be clear, the sentences should be fluent, the arguments should be clear and the arguments should be sufficient.