Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Standard strategy document
Standard strategy document
How to prepare for the civil service exam? Some people say it's diligence, some people say it's luck, and some people say it's relationship. I think the method is right. 20 17 national examination is my second time to take the civil service examination. 76 points in the application test, 7 1 point in the line test, 82 points in the interview, the first place in the written test, the second place in the interview, and the first place in the comprehensive ranking. So I was admitted to Qingdao national tax. As a landing candidate, I still have a lot of experience when it comes to the civil service examination. I don't have advanced learning theories and systematic methods. I'm just talking about my personal feelings about the examination and application, which is probably different from the methods of many public examination institutions. If you don't like it, please spray it gently.

For the review of the exam, there are the following suggestions:

First, learn to be willing. Give up modules that you are not good at and will not upgrade. According to my actual situation, I choose to give up quantitative relations and common sense judgment. But giving up doesn't mean not doing it, but spending less time to get more points in a limited time. For quantitative relations, I hardly look at the topic, and it takes tens of seconds to choose all B or C. Common sense judgment can't be so vague. You must look at the questions and complete 20 questions in about 8 minutes according to your knowledge reserve and first feeling. The rest of speech comprehension, judgment and reasoning, and data analysis are the most important things in exam review. After the accuracy of these three parts is improved, the test score will naturally not be low.

Second, find out the order of doing the questions that suits you. Many training institutions will tell us to make common sense judgment first in the exam, but this method is not suitable for me. In the usual practice, I will constantly adjust my order of doing problems and find out the habits that are most suitable for my brain. I do the questions in the order of speech comprehension, judgment and reasoning, data analysis, quantitative relationship and common sense judgment. The concentration time of the brain is limited, and it is impossible to be in a state of high efficiency for two hours, so when the brain is awake, do what you are good at first to ensure the correct rate.

Third, necessary memory and daily brushing are essential. For the formulas in data analysis, one can understand and remember by personal reasoning, which can improve the speed of data analysis. When you brush the questions, practice in modules first. After you have a certain understanding of each module, you can do the real questions of the provinces. True questions are the best review materials.

Fourth, after the weekly review plan is completed, we should summarize and grasp the overall framework of each module.

Key points of preparation for each module of line test:

First, common sense judgment

This module includes politics, economy, law, traditional culture, physical geography, science and technology, etc. In other words, this part of the exam is the basic knowledge of all major fields of society, which needs to be widely read by everyone. It is suggested that the preparation of common sense should not rely solely on the traditional positive accumulation method, but should gradually establish the thinking mode of "topic" and comprehensively use various methods such as exclusion, reverse deduction and comparison to get the correct answer.

Second, the quantitative relationship.

I gave up all quantitative relations and saved time for data analysis. I feel that this part of the quantitative relationship is difficult to improve in a short time. So I suggest that if someone is as bad at math as I am and slow in doing problems, then give up this part. Of course, it is best if students with strong mathematical ability can review the test sites across the board. But for most candidates, grasping the key points can improve this part of the score more effectively. Here I also want to talk about my understanding of the problem. I have counted the answers of quantitative relations over the years, and most of them are evenly distributed, so I only have one option, either B or C.

Third, speech comprehension.

This module is divided into logic fill in the blanks, reading comprehension and sentence expression. Logical fill-in-the-blank is mainly to choose words or idioms to form sentences. There are mainly correspondence analysis (there is a correspondence between vacancy and context), option judgment and language sense. Reading comprehension is divided into main topic, inferring the following topic and refining the topic. Topic: mainly look at the first and last sentences, related words (though, so), emphasized words (visible, actually), and then often follow the topic sentence, then look at the tendency and so on. Sentence expression: Sentence sorting questions, starting with options, according to the first and last sentences, according to related words, first judge the first and last, and then judge the middle. For this part of the review, we should be good at grasping the conventional analysis methods of language topics, such as "theme method", "summary method" and "total score method". And summarize different types of questions, and apply different types of answering ideas in a targeted manner. Although there are a large number of test questions, pronunciation comprehension can achieve "fast, accurate and stable" seconds kill through a certain intensity of training. I suggest you practice more, sum up well, and cultivate an accurate and fluent sense of language. You will definitely get high marks in this part.

Fourth, judgment and reasoning

This module includes four test sites: graphic reasoning, analogical reasoning, definition judgment and logical judgment, and each test site can be expanded and refined into many small test sites. Graphic reasoning: There are five core test sites: quantity, structure, location, superposition and combination. Definition judgment: this part is to give you a definition of a noun, so that you can find out the options that meet the definition. Analogical reasoning is to give two or three interrelated words and find out the word combinations that are also interrelated in the options. This part of logical judgment includes inevitability reasoning and possibility reasoning, and possibility reasoning is tested more. It is suggested that you first establish a systematic mind map structure in preparation for the exam, so as to comprehensively sort out the test sites; Secondly, we should master the basic logical laws and make a deep understanding with corresponding topics, such as "nature judgment reasoning", "syllogism reasoning", "relational reasoning", "hypothetical reasoning" and "joint reasoning". Finally, supplemented by a certain degree of practice, strengthen the "sensitivity" of the test sites hidden in each question type.

Data analysis of verb (abbreviation of verb)

This part is to give some written data, and then find the data from the written data for operation. But these data are very complicated, and if you don't master the method, you can't work it out at all. The score of this module in the line test is not low, but the difficulty is below average, which is called "giving points". But "free lunch" does not mean that it can be easily obtained without any systematic training. Data analysis is an examination module that can get excellent results through systematic training in a short time, so it must be treated strictly. It is suggested that you first fully master and be familiar with the technical terms and corresponding problems involved in data analysis; Secondly, establish a scientific reading method of data analysis topics and learn to accurately locate key tips and important data; Finally, you need to master some estimation skills that can be skillfully applied to yourself to greatly improve the calculation speed.

I have the following feelings about the application review:

First, you don't need to do many questions in the application. Maybe many people think I'm wrong, but personally, I don't think it's really necessary to do a lot of questions. It is enough to do fifty sets of real questions in one exam. For these sets of questions, you can do and summarize them repeatedly, compare your answers with the standard answers, find out your own gaps and improve your ability to summarize.

Second, the answers to application questions should be loyal to the original text. This is one of the reasons why I don't think it is necessary to do many questions in the application. The answer to the application only needs to be carefully searched and summarized in the materials, and you should not make up the answer from your own knowledge system at will.

Third, the logic of application is the most important. The materials given in the application are all useful, and every small problem in the application has its own logic. For example, to answer a defined question, first answer the connotation, that is, the meaning of this sentence or the word itself, then answer the extension, that is, the status quo, problems and purposes related to this sentence, and finally briefly summarize the countermeasures, so that you can get high marks. For other kinds of questions, you can summarize them through real questions. For each small question, you must read the questions carefully and find the logic of the questioner.

Fourth, the style of big composition should be chosen reasonably. There is no doubt that the big essay in the application must be an argumentative essay, in which we can be divided into political papers and policy papers. Political papers focus on analysis and briefly put forward countermeasures; Brief analysis of policy documents, focusing on countermeasures. For these two styles, we need to choose flexibly in the exam. If there are many countermeasures in the material, it will be better to write a political paper with a big composition. If there are many material problems, it will be better to write a strategy paper for a big composition.

Where there is a will, there is a way. As long as you have determination, perseverance and hard work, you will go ashore. My road to the public examination has come to an end, but my road to life is still very long. The road is uneven, tortuous and bumpy. . . But no matter what difficulties and obstacles I encounter on the road, I will bravely overcome them, not shrink back, not escape, and keep moving forward towards my goals! Finally, I wish my friends early success and contribute to the construction of the motherland!