This article is not an ordinary argumentative essay, but an essay. Composition is generally composed of topics, examples and opinions. If arguments, arguments and arguments are used mechanically, it may be difficult for students to really grasp the full text. If some teachers understand the argument as "there is more than one correct answer", this understanding is not very accurate. Because the title of the article "There is more than one correct answer to things" is just a topic, which is a basic point for the author to put forward his own views. What the author really wants to tell the readers in this article is the last paragraph: "Anyone is creative. First of all, we must firmly believe this. The key is to always be curious and accumulate knowledge; Not satisfied with an answer, but exploring new ideas and applying what you have learned; Once you have a little inspiration, believe in its value and develop it persistently. If you can do this, you will definitely become a creative person. " Obviously, this passage is the author's real intention, from which it can be clearly seen that the title is only one aspect. Thus, the title is not an argument, but a topic. Starting from this topic, the author gives three examples to deduce his own point of view. One is "from the following four kinds of figures, find out that one kind of character is different from the other three", and the conclusion is drawn from different angles; The second example is John. Goodensbeck, who developed a new product by combining two unrelated machines-grape press and coin making machine, and thus invented printing machine and typesetting; The third example is Roland. Bushnell, who invented the interactive table tennis video game, started the game machine revolution. Why does the author give three examples? He focused on his own point of view: anyone can be a creative person, as long as you follow my requirements. Of the three examples, the first focuses on not being satisfied with an answer, the second focuses on exploring new ideas, and the third focuses on maintaining curiosity. Of course, this is just the point. Only by integrating these three points can we create truly creative people. The author pays special attention to "confidence" and "perseverance" in his point of view. In this way, the structure of the article is clearer. In fact, the second seminar and exercise was designed in this way, following the overall perception route of "topic-example-point of view" and respecting the stylistic characteristics of the essay.

(2) How to combine reading and writing:

In order to give full play to the exemplary role of the text, the editor advocates what to learn and what to write, which is clearly reflected in the fourth discussion and exercise. "Copy the last paragraph of the text in a notebook, choose one of the viewpoints and cite one or two examples from life to prove it." In fact, it is to ask students to write an essay. In order to write this essay well, we might as well ask students to keep consistent with the text in the order of "topic-example-viewpoint".

(3) About Chinese knowledge:

According to the reality of this unit, we can take the study of rhetorical questions as a key point of this text, because there is no special Chinese knowledge in the textbook of People's Education Press, and these knowledge points are attached to the back of the text. For example, the figurative sentences in Spring are typical, and we can learn metaphors with the text. The personification sentences in Jinan in winter are wonderful, so you can learn personification with the text. There are many rhetorical questions in this article, so we can learn rhetorical questions in combination with the text. We should spend some time for students to ask questions about what, what is the unique function of asking questions, and how to make good use of these questions so that students can have a more real understanding and perception. It is not a mechanical term, but a feeling and taste in a specific language environment. In the future study of the text, students should review the typical rhetorical questions appropriately.

(4) Learning about this unit.

The text of this unit is different from the general argumentative unit. The first three articles are essays, in which "to understand the spirit of things" is similar to this, and it is also a structure of "topic-example-point of view" for students to imitate self-study. "Talking about reading" (Bacon) in the "two short essays" are basically famous aphorisms, so that students can read more and remember more. "Have China people lost confidence?" It is a rebuttal paper, which is the first time for students to contact and the only rebuttal paper in junior high school. Teachers should interpret it in detail according to its characteristics.