First, clear composition language and core
(1) In the essay examination, it is suggested that the writing style should be mainly argumentative, and the core of argumentative lies in general arguments and sub-arguments. The whole thesis focuses on this argument. The argument is wrong, and the writing level is off topic again. There is no need to discuss too much about the score gap between the second-class composition and the fourth-class composition!
(2) Brief comment: genre-argumentative essay; Core-General Argument and Sub-Argument
Second, the way to find the general argument
(1) The general argument generally refers to the core argument of the full text. Observing the development trend of the national examination and the provincial entrance examination in recent years, the angle of the general argument gradually becomes higher, which can often rise to the national level, so it gradually reduces the difficulty of finding the general argument of the application examination articles in recent years, and even a universal general argument can appear, such as the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, but the universal general argument cannot be used with all articles.
(2) Briefly discuss the method of finding the general argument: Step 1, find the topic of the article (the whole material describes the same topic, and the topic vocabulary appears directly in the stem, such as: entrepreneurship: value other than money).
(3) Discuss around the theme. If we want to seek a stable way, we usually focus on countermeasures and significance. With the difficulty of the questions in recent years, the most stable way is to write in the form of subject words and meanings, with a larger angle, because the general argument should cover the three branches of the article and dominate the full text.
The most stable and error-free way to simply discuss the general argument is: subject words+meaning (the biggest meaning in the material can include three sub-arguments)
In order to seek stability, some universal general arguments have been developed in recent years.
The expansion mode of the general argument: the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation: the Chinese dream of great rejuvenation; Help the country develop; Enhance the people's sense of gain (policy of benefiting the people); Beautiful China construction (ecology); Harmonious life between man and nature (ecology)
Third, find ways to divide arguments.
(1) Most students think that finding an argument is a difficult point in argumentative writing, but it is not very difficult. It's just that some students didn't master the method in the process of searching, which is a waste of time and not easy to find. Actually, it's very simple to find an argument.
(2) First of all, we should make clear the two commonly used angles of the paper. First, the argumentative essay based on analysis refers to: subject words+meaning and function. Second, the argumentative essay based on countermeasures refers to: subject words+countermeasures, means and measures.
(3) From the perspective of argumentation, it is required to summarize from the materials. In short, it is to find the meaning and countermeasures around keywords from the materials, which is equivalent to summarizing many materials. So in order to look like a headless fly, you can refer to the following methods:
First, find the sub-argument in the stem (usually the best sub-argument)
Second, see if there are two key words in the stem of the question, and they are opposite (such as fast and slow, happiness and defect)
Third, focus on observing the source of the topic and the materials that are not used in the non-composition topic.
Fourth, focus on observing whether there are non-composition topics around the theme, specifically: summing up practice, summarizing influence, inspiring comprehensive analysis, and proposing countermeasures. (Generally, this method has a small angle. If there is a higher angle, other methods are recommended. )
Fifth, the summary is sloppy (with a large angle, it can generally cover all materials)
Tip: Sub-arguments should not be too big, such as rising countries, so the general argument can be divided into four categories without sub-arguments.