I. Quantity and quality of papers
Academic circles usually pay attention to the number of researchers' papers and the quality published in high-impact journals. These journals may include widely cited and peer-reviewed journals. Academic circles usually distinguish between high-impact journals and low-impact journals to evaluate the contribution of researchers.
Evaluate the quantity and quality of papers;
1, number of papers
The number of papers of researchers can be used to evaluate their workload and the diversity of scientific research output. This can be measured by counting the number of papers published by researchers, conference papers or articles in international journals. But only focusing on the number of papers may ignore the quality and influence of papers.
2. Paper quality
To evaluate the quality of the paper, we can comprehensively consider many factors such as scientific research methods, rigorous experimental design, reliability of data, repeatability of results, originality and innovation of the paper. Peer review is a common method to evaluate the quality of papers. Peer experts anonymously evaluate papers to evaluate their scientific and academic quality.
Second, academic citation.
Academic citation refers to the number of times that research results are cited by other researchers. The number of academic citations of researchers can reflect the influence and importance of their research results. Generally, the research results cited by more other scholars are considered to be more influential and contribute more.
Academic citation evaluation:
1, number of references
The number of citations refers to the number of citations of researchers' papers or research results by other scholars. The research results often cited by other scholars are usually considered to have high influence and importance. Citation times can be counted and analyzed by academic search engines (such as Google Academic, Science Network, etc.). ) or academic database.
2. The breadth and depth of reference
Citation breadth refers to how many different scholars or research teams have cited research results. Wider citation can reflect the recognition and influence of research results in academic circles. Citation depth refers to the degree to which research results are deeply discussed and cited by other scholars in their research. The breadth and depth of citation are important indicators to measure the influence of research results.
Third, academic reputation.
Academic reputation refers to the popularity and credibility of researchers in their own fields. It can be measured by the activity of researchers in the community, the status of academic organizations, academic awards, and invitations to lectures. Academic reputation is usually based on long-term research results, and researchers with good reputation can often win the respect and recognition of their peers.
Measurement of academic reputation:
1, academic organization position
The position of scientific researchers in academic organizations is also one of the important indicators to evaluate academic reputation. For example, as an editor of academic journals, a member of the Council or Committee of academic associations, etc. These positions show that researchers have a high position and responsibility in academia, further consolidating their academic reputation.
2. Academic awards and honors
Obtaining academic awards and honors is also an important basis for evaluating academic reputation. These awards can be awarded by academic circles or institutions in this field, such as academic contribution award and best paper award. Winning these awards shows that researchers have been widely recognized and appreciated in academic circles.