Who will treat Darwin's "infinite random evolution" hypothesis as "science"? If "biology" is used, if it is really "natural selection, survival of the fittest", which pests and beasts are far more suitable for survival than humans, then the earth is full of harmful insects, poisonous snakes and ferocious beasts. Because they are the "strong and the fittest" who can survive in any environment, even some plants eat meat, and many extremely low-level insects and wild animals kill people with chemicals. "Survival of the fittest" makes people have nowhere to hide. Then people are just uncomfortable and can't exist on the earth long ago. Is there anyone else in the world?
Science has found that only one of the 300 million human sperm is allowed to enter the egg, and the others are not allowed to enter. If Darwin's hypothesis of random "natural evolution" without destination is really scientific, then at least 654.38 billion sperm can be randomly "naturally selected" into an egg.
No one in the coyote population has ever guided them, mobilized them and convinced them that "inbreeding is very harmful". Scientists have spent 10 years following up and proved that the animal kingdom without moral constraints can stop incest on its own. This driving force is there, and science has been unable to solve this mystery. Is it idealism? Can it be explained by evolution?
The calendar error we are using now is 0.0003 days per year, while the Maya is 0.0002 days per year. The calendars used by the Mayans thousands of years ago were more accurate than those we use now. From low to high "evolution" principle?
As we all know, the recorded history of human beings is only 2000 years, but 7000 years ago, human beings built the pyramids of Egypt. People have only known how to dress for 4600 years. However, the exquisite bronzes of 1. 1 10,000 years ago have been found at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, nails 20,000 years ago, murals 30,000 years ago, and traces of bullets penetrating the bones of cattle and sheep 40,000 years ago have been found and confirmed all over the world.
Atomic energy technology is a cutting-edge technology that human beings have mastered only in recent decades, but nuclear reactors 2 billion years ago were accidentally discovered in Gabon and Oklo uranium mines in Africa.
These are things and technologies that primitive humans can't do, and some of them are not achieved or made by modern people. But these things are really in front of us. They not only stunned modern people, but also exposed the history of human development established by modern people and Darwin's apes. Can the defenders of Darwinism answer?
Quite simply, sports lovers like to buy sports equipment and musicians like to buy musical instruments. Biology must be accepted by biologists first, but science will be carried out in the form of scientific community, so it can only be made public by emphasizing the verification of evidence and finally agreeing. But with political implementation, things will be simple and there will be no evidence.
183 1 Darwin was a devout Christian and just graduated from the theological seminary of Cambridge University. As it happens, Captain fitzroy needs a companion. On the recommendation of his tutor J·s· Henslow, a 26-year-old Darwin gentleman took part in the round-the-world voyage of the British navy sailboat Beagle in June 5438+February of the same year, and stayed in the captain's seat for five years. For the purpose of collecting biological specimens, he began his dream-an unpaid amateur naturalist sailing expedition, and was later honored to be elected as a member of the Royal Society. These conditions made Darwin very clear that fame and family were just around the corner. Coupled with Huxley's strong support from a group of friends who also want to be unconventional and famous. At that time, during the period of the dark pope, the voices of European religious circles were everywhere; Daniel 12 Bible verse 7: ... "All this will be realized after a year, a year or two, when the power of saints is broken." These three and a half years, that is, 1260 days, refer to the prophecy of dark papal rule from 538 to 1798 in the Middle Ages. Under the corrupt and autocratic Catholic centralization of authority; Trial courts began to operate in southern France. During the period from 1823 to 1846, 200,000 people in the papal countries were sentenced to death, life imprisonment, exile or hard labor, and another1500,000 people were monitored and examined. Under the leadership of this group of political empire careerists in religious cloaks, the true "love" and "goodness" in God's Bible have been completely discredited in people's eyes. 1520+05438+02 At the beginning of 2002, German Christian Martin Luther and other religious reform leaders went through hardships, and finally saved the pure Christian faith from the centralized power of corrupt and autocratic Catholicism. The reputation of Christ was still recovering and the "foundation" was still shaken. It is understood that people in many countries in the world were worried at that time. In many countries, polytheism, especially the semi-colonial and semi-feudal society of China under the moral rule of monotheism of "Confucius and Mencius", has reached the peak of superstition of door gods, kitchen gods, water gods and Vulcan gods. People hate outdated feudal superstitions and moral constraints and are looking for a new theory and morality to change the outdated status quo. Darwin's theory just catered to this political need at that time. It can also be said that this politician Darwin, represented by a "biologist", did a good thing at that time.
At that time, the British Empire was the "home country" of constitutionalism after the industrial revolution and was in the stage of expansion. With the appearance of "legalized" privateering license, piracy, as a tool for the country to strengthen its navy, the maritime overlord of Britain began with a group of pirates. Speaking of ancient pirates, you will immediately think of Drake, the "royal pirate" who was the commander-in-chief of the Royal Navy. Someone once bluntly said: Britain is a large group of pirates, and Elizabeth is the biggest pirate leader. 1588, Spain's "Armada" fell, and then the "sea coachman" was defeated in the Netherlands. Finally, France was defeated in the seven-year war in the late18th century and became the world hegemon. The subjects of the "empire that never sets" were once "winners". Before Darwin published the Origin of Species, someone in Britain publicly published a statement that was obviously the same as Darwin's theory: "The winner is king in the competition for survival". Many long-awaited struggle philosophies of "survival competition, winner is king" wait and tempt Darwin's political theory of "survival of the fittest" to cater to it.
Even more coincidentally; /kloc-since the 0/5th century, British society has advocated people to express their opinions publicly, which naturally created conditions for Darwin to create a "hero" for himself. At that time, many people, including theologians, scientists, philosophers, especially politicians, were puzzled about the relationship between human ability and God's authority, which was proved by great psychological support and theory.
Carl. Marx wrote an inscription on his second edition of Das Kapital and presented it to Darwin, calling himself a loyal admirer of Darwin.
Engels, an outstanding politician in the world, highly praised Darwin's "evolution theory", especially the hypothesis that "human beings originated from apes" and made several important supplements to it. Engels said: "Labor created man", and he also said that "the use of fire finally separated man from the animal kingdom".
Charles robert darwin, 50, has been searching for more than 20 years. None of the fossil specimens found at that time could be regarded as transitional fossils, and he could not prove the authenticity of his paper. Darwin, who was very critical of the evidence, compressed the Origin of Species to about one third.
When the truth is basically smeared, people cannot get the real origin of biology. Darwin, a devout Christian who knew the origin of truth and a member of the Royal Society, could easily get the crown. According to the needs of the struggle at that time, he would take people to the unpowered desert half way from the truth, and creatures would give birth to their own agnosticism of "natural selection". Because it is a desert, only seeing footprints is the way, so today's natural selection "evolution" is just called "science".
At that time, under the impetus of Engels and other influential politicians, the hypothesis that "human beings originated from ancient apes" became a final conclusion, which made people think that our ancestors were really apes and spread all over the world. Nobody paid attention at that time.
In the 76-page article of Darwinism, Darwinism itself admits that it is "the necessity of the times"; With the emergence of capitalism and colonialism, "evolution" has become necessary. For capitalists who believe in capitalist free economy, "natural elimination", "survival of the fittest" and "competitive survival" are undoubtedly new weapons to fight against socialists who advocate the position of the weak and conservatives who don't like change. Darwin's "theory of evolution" provides a legitimate theoretical support for the exploitation of capitalist society and the rule of foreign powers over colonies.
Biology, which embraces the philosophy of political struggle, caters to many people's longing for it for a long time and pushes Darwin to the throne of a very respected "hero". "Evolution" no longer needs more convincing evidence from logic, biology, archaeology or any other theory, and becomes an unquestionable axiom. This is a historical fact, even in today's Darwin leadership circle, real scientists are recognized.
On May 20th, 20 10, the seventh edition of Reference News reprinted the physicist's report in the frugal room of the National Fermi Accelerator in the United States, saying: … At the same time, it will also indicate that human beings may explain their existence.
Who, a real scientist, has paid attention to the fact that human existence has been changed by "apes" If Darwin had a brain, who would say that his "theory of evolution" was "science"?
Reference news February 2009 18 edition 12 Reprinted in Spanish newspaper Le Monde February 10 Malcolm? Hones's article clearly tells people: "Darwin rarely wrote scientific papers, but the Origin of Species is worth reading as a literary work." The article clearly points out that Darwin and Lincoln are both epoch-making politicians. The article said: "Darwin read the economist Thomas? Two years later, Matthews' book about human plundering resources for survival established the theory of "natural selection". "
Obviously, it is a great blow to the real biological science, and the theological thought of moral concept and peace consciousness is naturally sworn enemies. Because it is not science at all, it completely changed the norms and direction of biological science, which was the need of the struggle situation of capitalism and colonialism at that time.
Sadly, there are so many Darwin defenders who don't know the internal affairs to compete with others for "science" because they were widely promoted by the political circles needed for the struggle in those years.
The 42-page article in Darwin's theory of evolution clearly points out that Malthus's theory gave Darwin the ideas he needed. Real scientists are practical and realistic, and have publicly and clearly attached two illustrations of "Survival of the fittest". Just like a young man with a flat head who pulls down his underwear to show you, you still insist on calling him "little girl". What else can you do to make you understand? This person really can't tell what is "science" and what is "philosophy of struggle"? Can't modern literature even distinguish between "magic" and "science"
Darwin was also outspoken in his autobiography. 1838+065438 10, he happened to read thomas robert malthus's cruel book "Essays on the Principles of Population", which influenced and inspired his views on evolution.
The influence of Malthusian theory on Darwin and Alfred, the founders of "Modern Evolution"? Wallace has an important influence. Darwin said in the book Origin of Species: "His theory is the application of Malthusian theory in a field without human intelligence intervention. Darwin was an admirer of Malthus all his life. " Call him a "great philosopher". Wallace called Malthus' works "... the most important book I have ever read" and said that it was "the most interesting coincidence" that he and Darwin independently developed "evolution theory" by studying Malthus' theory.
Malthus estimated that if it is not controlled, the population will increase rapidly. In his view, the main factors of population control are wars, famines, diseases and other disasters. In a word, according to this cruel statement, for the survival of some people, others must die. Survival means "eternal war". Evolutionists generally believe that Malthus has made many contributions to evolution unintentionally. Malthus' thought on population is the basis of modern evolution. Malthus strengthened his observation of "struggle for existence" under the condition of "limited growth". Due to Malthusian theory, Darwin realized that the competition for survival occurred not only between species, but also within the same species.
Influenced by these thoughts, Darwin proposed that the strong and the fittest would win in the competition for survival.
On the back cover of Evolution, the story of the law of the jungle is clearly mentioned: Evolution: The Story of the Law of the jungle skillfully links the law of biological struggle with human society, breaks through the limitations of evolutionary science, and integrates history, anthropology, archaeology, sociology and management.
On the cover of the Origin of Species, it is openly declared that social competition should consider the survival law of "natural selection, survival of the fittest".
In the third chapter "struggle for existence" of the Origin of Species, Darwin told people that the species of the same genus are more intense than those of different genera. In Russia, small Asian cockroaches expel large Asian cockroaches everywhere after entering the country; In Australia, small boneless local bees died out soon after being imported. It also tells people that in the great struggle for existence where creatures compete for food and shelter, the structure of one species defeating another is often hidden. Darwin also clearly told people that we really know very little about the relationship between living things. In other words, Darwin has clearly told people; He didn't write this book from a biological point of view at all.
Moreover, he also advocated that the so-called struggle for existence was a legal and unchangeable law of nature, and applied the prejudice and contradictory views of British society at that time to all aspects of nature. Therefore, the so-called "creature" he inherited can only see the cruel struggle of mammals, and there is no other side of biological harmony and cooperation. It only spread to the whole world through the "biological world", giving it a seemingly scientific appearance. This point is also calmly written on page 46 of Darwin's theory of evolution.
1860, Darwin wrote to his friend Asa Gray, a professor of botany at Harvard University, and said, "As for the theological views on this issue [the origin of human beings], I always feel painful and confused. I have no intention of writing articles to promote atheism. But I admit that after seeing the design of creation and the evidence of God's kindness around us, there seems to be too much suffering in this world ... On the other hand, if I want to regard this wonderful universe, especially human nature, as the result of brute force, I will not be reconciled anyway. I believe everything is done according to the designed rules, but the details ... listen to the so-called opportunities. But I think the whole problem is too profound for human intelligence to solve ... "
Darwin founded the theory of "competition for existence", which became the premise and foundation of his theory of "natural selection". It is universally acknowledged that the obvious mistake of Darwin's "evolution theory" is that he only sees the struggle of creatures and does not see their mutual assistance, which is really unlike the framework and layout of scientific reasoning.