Extended data:
First of all, the current problems
In academic circles, many scholars blindly pursue the output of scientific research results, and often exaggerate their own research results in order to gain more prestige and rewards. This situation is mainly manifested in the increasing tendency to evaluate research results by factors such as the number and level of published articles, which leads some people to ignore the quality and essence of research and pursue superficial forms.
Second, emphasize the importance of research content and quality.
1. From the perspective of academic ethics, researchers should respect facts, strictly abide by scientific research norms, and always put the quality of scientific research first.
2. Researchers should pay attention to the connotation of research, actively explore blind spots in the research field and make innovative breakthroughs.
At the same time, it is also important to publish articles in influential academic journals, but this should not be the only goal.
Third, abandon the practice of quantitative evaluation indicators.
1. In the process of evaluating scientific research achievements, reviewers should pay attention to the serious analysis and investigation of the contents, conclusions and innovations of the papers, rather than just looking at the superficial factors such as the number of published papers and the grade of published publications.
2. We should not simply take quantitative factors as the only evaluation standard of scientific research output, but pay more attention to the detailed evaluation of research quality and practical significance.
Fourth, strengthen the construction of industry self-discipline.
In the development of the industry, we should further strengthen the construction of self-discipline mechanism, improve the rules and regulations in the industry, and set up special institutions to be responsible for the academic ethics supervision system to ensure the authority, independence and rigor of the evaluation procedures. Only in this way can scholars pay attention to the content and quality of research and realize the transformation of academic evaluation from "publication and comment" to "humanistic value"
In a word, the evaluation of academic achievements deserves attention and pursuit, which should be the depth and breadth of research content, the scientificity and reliability of research methods, and the innovation and importance of practical application. Only in this way can we reflect the value and significance of scientific research results.