There are two ways to realize "Jane": from Jane to Jane and from Jane to Jane. Simple, a little, just cut to the chase, not much. It eliminates complexity through subtraction rules, thus achieving the purpose of pursuing simplification. Is to form a simple or even pure quality in quantity. A long laugh mentality has been brewing from the inside. Simple, a little, it's accumulation, not compression. It makes it clean by division. It is to vacate subtlety and even essence from quality improvement. Stand out from the outside as a competitive mechanism. Can be said to be a relatively simple, but also a relatively complex. Look at two advertising slogans first. One is simple for men, and the other is simple but not simple. Behind them is a bumpy and magnificent philosophy of life. There is no doubt that we cannot deny these values. But you can't advocate it one by one, or even blurt it out. It's simple but not simple. Tracing back to Laozi's attitude towards fertility, on one hand, is to be simple and let nature take its course. But as a descendant deeply influenced by Confucianism, it has been forming an implicit color. That I am too lazy to get what I need, because I am tired of myself. This time is not simple, and it is not so tired and weak! Let's look at two common sayings: one is simple-minded, and the other is that a woman without talent is virtuous. Modern people's eyes are mostly critical and negative. Let's stop here. However, on the other hand, sometimes we just need to keep our heads simple. Think about it, cleverness is mistaken by cleverness, and the agency will not let Haw's life go. Women have no talent, and their troubles and worries may be relatively less. I do not agree with modern packaging design. It should be implicit, but now, we should simply warn it. I dare not indulge in modern costume art, it is too simple. Do you really want to prove that no talent is virtue? This reminds me of the forest trip of the seven sages of bamboo forest. The former flaunts openness, the latter is wild. It's not the same, but I think it's better to keep it simple. People need a simple and contractual alliance in their life until they are integrated. Only in this way can we be happy.

Argumentative essay refers to an article that focuses on argumentation and reasoning. As a major style of college entrance examination, it has always been one of the focuses of students' study and training. An argumentative essay with strong reasoning logic can often get a higher score in the college entrance examination. (1) argument (1) What is an argument? Argument is the point to be discussed and expounded in the article, and it is the viewpoint and proposition to be expressed by the author. When reading an argumentative essay, the first thing is to find, extract and understand the arguments of the article. (2) There are multiple arguments: an article can have one or more arguments. If there is more than one argument, it is necessary to clarify the central argument. These arguments can be parallel or progressive, but they all obey the central argument of the whole paper. (3) the position of the argument: the argument of the article can be arranged at the beginning, or at the middle or end of the article. In other words, it can be arranged anywhere in the article. But it is more often at the beginning of the article, and so is the paragraph argument. (4) Presentation of arguments: Some argumentative arguments are expressed in clear sentences in the article, and we just need to find them out; Others are not directly expressed in clear sentences and need to be refined and summarized by readers themselves. (5) Pay attention to the proposition and establishment of the argument: ① correctness. The persuasiveness of an argument is rooted in the correct reflection of objective things, and the correct reflection of objective things depends on whether the author's position, viewpoint, attitude and method are correct. If the argument itself is incorrect or even a lie, then no matter how it is argued, it can't be convincing. Therefore, the correct argument is the minimum requirement for argumentative writing. ② Significance. What is for and what is against should be very clear, not ambiguous. 3 novelty. Arguments should be as original and profound as possible, and can transcend other people's views. They should not repeat other people's cliches, nor should they be irrelevant and superficial. They should be as novel and unique as possible. (2) Argument (1) What is an argument? Argument is the material and foundation to prove an argument. (2) Types of arguments: ① factual materials ② theoretical materials. (1) As the factual material of the argument, it can be A. Specific cases B. Summarized facts C. Statistical data D. Personal experiences and feelings. (2) As theoretical materials for argument, it can be A. The classic works and wise sayings of predecessors B. Folk proverbs and sayings C. Scientific axioms, laws and so on. (3) Requirements for using arguments: ① certainty. We must choose those hard and typical facts. When citing theoretical materials that have been tested by practice as arguments, we must pay attention to the exact meaning of the cited theory itself. ② Typical. The cited examples should be widely representative, representing the general characteristics and properties of such things. (3) the unity of arguments and arguments. The argument is to prove the argument, so the two should be closely related. (3) Argumentative essay (1) What is argumentative essay? Argumentation is the process of proving an argument with arguments. The argument of argument is to solve "what to prove", the argument is to solve "what to prove" and the argument is to solve the problem of "how to prove". The self-purpose of argumentation is to reveal the internal logical relationship between argumentation and argumentation. (2) Types of argumentative essays: argumentative essays are generally divided into argumentation and refutation. (1) argument is a way to prove the correctness of the author's own argument with sufficient arguments; (2) Refutation is a way to refute others' wrong arguments with strong arguments. Argumentation and refutation are proofs, one is to prove oneself right from the front, and the other is to prove oneself wrong from the back. They can use basically the same argument method. (3) Basic argumentation methods: including induction, example, deduction, analogy and comparison. ① induction. Inductive argument is an argument method from individual to general. It draws a general conclusion through many individual examples or arguments, and then summarizes their characteristics. Induction can give examples before drawing a conclusion, or it can put forward a conclusion and prove it with examples. The former is what we usually call induction, and the latter is what we call example. Example method is an argument method to prove the argument with individual and typical concrete examples. ② Deductive method. Deductive argument is a kind of argument method from general to individual. It deduces conclusions about individual situations from general principles, and the relationship between its premise and conclusions is necessary. There are many forms of deduction, such as syllogism, hypothetical reasoning and selective reasoning, but the most important one is syllogism. Syllogism consists of three parts: major premise, minor premise and conclusion. Such as the major premise that all metals can conduct electricity, iron is the minor premise of metals, and iron can conduct electricity. ③ Comparative method. Comparative argument is an argument method from individual to individual. Usually divided into two categories, one is analogy and the other is comparison. Analogy is a method of comparing different things with the same or similar properties and characteristics in some aspects, so as to draw a conclusion. Contrast is a method to prove an argument by comparing different things whose nature and characteristics are opposite or opposite in some respects. (4) Refutation method: There are three ways to refute an argument, namely, ① refuting an argument, ② refuting an argument, and ③ refuting an argument. Because argumentative writing is composed of arguments, arguments and arguments, refuting arguments or arguments has the same effect as directly refuting arguments. A rebuttal paper can combine several rebuttal methods to strengthen the strength and persuasiveness of refutation. (1) Refuting an argument, that is, directly refuting the one-sided, false or fallacy of the other party's argument itself, is the most commonly used method in refuting. (2) refuting the argument, that is, revealing the mistakes of the other party's argument, in order to achieve the purpose of knocking down the other party's argument; Because the wrong argument will inevitably lead to the wrong argument. (3) Refuting the argument, that is, exposing the logical errors of the other party in the process of argument, such as the contradiction between major premise, minor premise and conclusion, the contradiction between the other party's arguments, the contradiction between arguments and so on. Argumentative writing is a style in which the author analyzes and comments on a certain issue or thing, and shows his own views, positions, attitudes, opinions and propositions. Argumentative writing has three elements, namely argument, argument and argument. The basic requirements of an argumentative essay are: correct viewpoints, serious generalization, practical significance, and proper comprehensive use of various expressions; The arguments are basically: true and reliable, fully typical; The basic requirement of argument is that reasoning must be logical. When writing an argumentative essay, you should consider the argument, what to use as an argument to prove it, how to demonstrate it, and then draw a conclusion. You can put forward a general argument first, then discuss it separately, analyze each sub-argument, and finally draw a conclusion; You can also quote a story, a dialogue, or describe a scene first, and then analyze the facts layer by layer and draw new conclusions. This way of writing is called total score, which is commonly used by middle school students. You can also ask a question that everyone cares about at the beginning of the article, and then answer it one by one, step by step, which is a difficult way to write. It also requires the author to compare two different things in the opposite way, and then draw a conclusion, which is comparative writing. Argumentative writing is a style that uses logic, reasoning and proof to explain the author's position and viewpoint. This kind of article either puts forward some views and opinions from the front, or refutes other people's wrong views. Comments in newspapers, essays or feelings in daily life all belong to the category of argumentative essays. Argumentative writing, also called argumentative writing, is a style of analyzing things, discussing things, expressing opinions and putting forward opinions. By stating facts, reasoning and distinguishing right from wrong, the author can determine whether his point of view is right or wrong, and establish or deny a proposition. Argumentative writing should have clear thinking, sufficient arguments, concise language, reasonable arguments and strict logic. I. Three Elements of Argumentative Writing Argumentative writing mainly includes three elements: argument, argument and argumentation method. The argument must be correct. This argument is used to illustrate this argument. It should be reliable and sufficient. Facts speak louder than words and are the best argument. Arguments can also be accepted truths and philosophies that have been tested by practice. There are many ways to demonstrate, and the common methods are: 1. Induction is to start with the analysis of typical cases, that is, to analyze individual things, find out the similarities and differences of things, and then draw conclusions. 2. Reasoning starts from general principles, explains and analyzes individual things, and then draws conclusions. 3. Compare all the facts and aspects, then analyze and draw a conclusion. 4. The rebuttal method lists the wrong views first, then refutes them one by one, and finally clarifies your own views. Second, the characteristics of argumentative essays generally have three parts: introduction, text and conclusion sentence. Generally, an argument is put forward in the introduction part, that is, the theme of the article, and favorable facts are put forward in the body part. After strict argumentation, the conclusion is finally drawn according to the previous arguments. Third, the writing method of argumentative essays To write argumentative essays well, we must pay attention to the following points: 1. Determine the argument. Arguments are usually put forward in the first paragraph of an article. 2. To have sufficient arguments, you can cite examples from your life. This argument should be strictly logical. All facts, reasons and reasons should be closely related to the conclusion. 4. The level should be clear. 5. Sincere and friendly attitude, because the argument focuses on being reasonable and convincing. Argumentative writing focuses on discussion, but sometimes it also uses explanation, narration and description. The explanation in the discussion often creates conditions for the discussion, or supplements the discussion; Narration and description in argumentative essays should provide basis for arguments. Therefore, the narrative should be general and the description should be brief. 6. The arguments should be sufficient. In order to prove your point, you must have sufficient evidence. The author can cite facts, show data, provide examples, use common sense or personal experience.

Writing for exams is also a race against time. According to a survey of some candidates in the middle school attached to the National People's Congress, the average writing time of candidates is only about 40 minutes. It is not easy to finish a composition of nearly a thousand words in such a short time! For some candidates, if you don't start writing slowly as usual, then you can't guarantee to finish your composition in time, even if you have good articles in your stomach, what's the use? To prepare for writing, we must race against time, "write a thousand words, rely on horses, etc." On the premise of correct examination, we should write quickly, and time does not allow us to think about how to start before writing. Therefore, in order to quickly choose the most suitable exam, it is very necessary to learn some good entry methods. What kind of start is a good start? Qiao Mengfu said that the beginning of the article should be like a "phoenix head". This sentence vividly States two characteristics that a good beginning should have-short and beautiful. Short, so that readers can understand the argument or topic, so as to grasp the main idea of the full text; Beautiful, can attract readers. As Xie Zhen in the Ming Dynasty said, "At the beginning of a sentence, it sounds like firecrackers." How crisp and neat firecrackers are! Don't procrastinate, procrastinate. Firecrackers are very attractive, attracting people's attention at once, and a good article should start like this. So, what are the criteria for a good start? First of all, be clear. A good beginning, let the reader know what you want to say at once, that is, let the reader know your argument or topic. Bai Juyi said that "the first sentence is aimed at its purpose", and he advocated making the beginning clear. Li Tu said in "The Essentials of Articles": "In a word, it is best to start with a word." In short, let readers know what you are talking about and know its purpose from the beginning. Second, be beautiful. Only beauty can attract readers. The beauty at the beginning of the article mainly refers to the beauty of skills, such as setting suspense, using allusions, quoting famous sayings, asking questions, highlighting goals and rebounding. Formal beauty is the guarantee of content beauty, and the two complement each other. Never underestimate the formal beauty and skill at the beginning of an article. With this kind of beauty, you can take the lead and attract people to read your article. In this sense, "a good beginning is half the battle." Third, simplicity. Simplicity is the guarantee of clarity. Some candidates are too wordy to retell the raw materials when writing compositions for the materials. What should I do if I start with raw materials and can't repeat them? There are two ways: one is to "summarize" raw materials; The other is to select representative sentences from raw materials to let readers know what raw materials generally mean, and never quote more raw materials. Example: Too much treasure is a kind of treasure beyond a certain limit, which is definitely a bad thing. My parents came from a hard family and cherish everything. For a time, I lived at home and threw my used ballpoint pen into the trash can. The next day, this ballpoint pen will definitely appear in the glass bottle on the table-this glass bottle was an empty medicine bottle ten years ago. The ballpoint pen was picked up by my father. My father has collected a drawer of this used ballpoint pen. Because I can't bear to throw away old things, my home is congested and full of rubbish: rotten tableware, a wooden stool with a broken leg ... the home environment is destroyed in a mess. It takes a long time to find something useful. This is the result of excessive cherish. One autumn, I bought a bottle of skin cream for my mother. One morning, when my mother was applying skin cream to her face, she accidentally knocked over the bottle and spilled the skin cream on the table. I was about to wipe off the spilled skin cream with a towel when my mother quickly put her finger into the bottle and said, what a pity to throw away such an expensive thing. In a few days, the whole bottle of skin cream broke down and had to be thrown away. This is also the result of excessive cherish. Too much treasure is also manifested in many ways. For example, cherish a job too much. In fact, this job is not suitable for you, and your value is not better reflected. Even become a burden and pain, but you are reluctant to give up. You have been comforting yourself with "it's hard to find a job, after all, life is still stable". As a result, you have lived a grand life in this painful treasure and lost more opportunities to develop yourself. This kind of excessive treasure is a kind of autism. For example, cherish an old time and a lover in the past too much. Knowing that everything is over, everything has passed, and no amount of thoughts and nostalgia will help. We must dwell on the past, suffering and unable to extricate ourselves. The result is to ignore the grass in front of us and miss the better scenery we can grasp at present. This excessive cherish is a kind of self-harm. The road of life is too long and the capacity of life is too limited. We can't hold everything in our hands and take it to heart with an overly cherished mood. We must give up some useless things, make enough room for some valuable things, and then go into battle lightly to pursue a full and rich life.