For example, reading an argumentative paper, reading a title paper, or parameters, such as the topic "blank", are obviously the themes drawn by using figurative rhetoric. Therefore, the rhetorical title used cannot be regarded as the central argument.
Parameter sentence "What is certain and affirmative?" The second mock exam is not only about whether the topic of art is a parameter, because it is a negative judgment structure.
There are often two types of errors in parameters, chaotic central arguments and sub-arguments, and chaotic central arguments and conclusions. The central argument, which distinguishes the central argument from the sub-argument, is a supplement, not a part of the parameters that are completely mastered. Distinguish the conclusions of the central argument and pay attention to summarizing the meanings and functions that sentences often talk about.
2。 Coupled with the discussion of suitable topics, we must understand the content of the full text and contact the topic of the topic.
The setter comes from two aspects: first, the answer of thinking, depending on what the topic of this article is, all questions can be discussed; The central argument is that the central argument can be used to display the title of the table.
3。 According to the requirements, summarize the meaning, which requires the author's writing ideas and well-answered argumentation ideas, and is divided into several parts.
Comprehensive investigation of the structure of the full text, focusing on the textual level. From the structural level to the content, the article should start to see how it is thought and developed.
Mainly part of the article about the theme. If after the content of the central part of the first parameter, several well-made types of total-sub-theory-convention are finally summed up and considered as the first one, and then the total-sub types are demonstrated from several aspects; Discuss and analyze several aspects and come to a conclusion, which is the "theory-"type.
Controversy, and then step by step to deepen the level, clear the type of "drilling".
We should also pay attention to the role of turning sentences and turning words in criticizing articles. If either side of the sentence "yes" and "other than this" is not unique, then it is also "first" and "second", in other words, it is substituted into the formula.
4。 Sentence, find out a statement and explain its function, which requires methods of understanding, analysis and argumentation, and must be analyzed in combination with the function of argument and content.
Can be used to make sentences under the heading:
Such as: figurative parameters+vivid arguments and arguments and contents.
For example, parameters+evidence are fully representative+arguments are combined with arguments and contents.
5。 A wide range of parametric materials. First of all, we should pay attention to the central sentence, the first sentence summarizes one sentence, the second sentence grasps the narrative of people, things and other elements, compresses them in concise language, and then follows the formula of "people (things)+development"
6。 It implies a powerful language for discussing prose and studying or understanding the meaning of certain sentences. We must clarify the point of this article? The author, the purpose of writing, can turn the difficult into the easy. You can use the following formula: rhetoric+parameters of this sentence.
7。 When adding parameters, be sure to accept strong arguments, and there are parameters between shaded service lines. There are two basic forms of factual argumentation and factual argumentation. In fact, parameters refer to historical facts and statistical data represented by hard examples. Fact demonstration means that the correctness of the theory has been proved as the speech theorem of revolutionary teachers and celebrities and the common sense of life science.
To read the parameters, we must first analyze the author and check whether the logic of the article is consistent from the truth of the facts.
Celebrities and some typical examples of reading, hard work, happiness, ideals and time all say that this practice can be accumulated.
8。 Some paragraphs have been transposed. Examining the relationship between paragraphs can not only take care of the first few paragraphs before and after, but also take care of the logical order (progressive scanning, in turn, causality, the nature of phenomena). According to this method, universal application is not a problem.
9。 The wording is accurate, rigorous and logical.
The universality of argumentative language tends to use more abstract words to express rich content. The language of argumentation is still very rigorous and thoughtful, and it is often impeccable. When reading comments and criticisms, we should grasp these key sentences and ponder them over and over again. Controversial, not only reasonable, but also touching reasons, with strong emotional color.
Whether or not we delete a word in the same mold, we can use the following model: "from, from+the meaning of the word in the text (withholding arguments and sub-arguments)+the consequences of deletion+accuracy and thoroughness (logic and vividness).
10。 Seek answers to other subjective questions and try to find out the intention of the question.
The general steps of reading an argumentative essay in a short time can be summarized as follows:-perceive the content of the article as a whole-deeply understand the style-understand the thought, center, thought and emotional problems of the article from the style form-answer.
The title will lose less points according to the above method, but it is not omnipotent. They need to study in peacetime and think more about their emotions.