According to my practical experience in composition teaching, I think an effective composition improvement course should have the following three links: link 1: targeted selection of articles, which is the basis for building an efficient composition improvement course. In this link, teachers should pay attention to choosing compositions with obvious advantages, obvious tendentiousness problems and low scores.
The composition improvement course should also have clear objectives and requirements under the guidance of the whole composition teaching plan, and resolutely avoid randomness. In order to improve the actual effect, the principle of pertinence should be embodied in the composition selection of diseases. Teachers should establish the purpose of promotion according to the actual situation of marking, choose the composition that can represent the outstanding problems of the class, and strive to tell "this time" well so that students can have a lesson.
In this way, the problems in students' compositions are solved one by one, and the "debts" in students' compositions are paid off in stages, thus improving step by step. Link 2: Appreciation evaluation, which is the premise of constructing an efficient composition promotion course.
Yan Yuan, a great educator in ancient China, said: "There are dozens of them, but they won't win prizes for a long time, which hurts their hearts. If they don't change after counting, they will win prizes, which is full of goodwill." This sentence also applies to the composition improvement course.
Although students' compositions have shortcomings, they must have advantages, and these advantages are the starting point for students to improve their writing level. Teachers should fully affirm the advantages of students' composition in spite of illness, because encouragement and appreciation are always effective ways to stimulate students' enthusiasm for learning.
Moved by the teacher's praise, students are willing to enter the composition improvement course, face the existing problems realistically with a peaceful mind, and are willing to accept the criticism and suggestions put forward by the teacher, thus laying the foundation for the efficient composition improvement course. When students put forward suggestions for the improvement of sick strips, whether it is pertinent or not, the teacher had better listen and not interrupt, so that students can feel the patience of all ages and attach importance to his opinions.
When students have a wonderful speech, even if it is only a good word or even a delicate word in the upgrade paragraph, young and old should praise and appreciate more. Only in this way can students experience the joy of success, stimulate their interest in learning and perform better in class.
In short, impression is better than evaluation, so that students can enter the classroom with a "fiery heart" and enhance their interest in listening to lectures. Link 3: upgrading and rewriting This is an important guarantee for building an efficient composition upgrading course.
The so-called upgrading and rewriting means that after the teacher's composition upgrading course, the students have already understood the overall situation of this composition, and on the basis of modifying their classmates' sick articles, they have a concrete and perceptual understanding and rewrite the composition with a view to their own shortcomings. This process is the deepening of rational understanding.
The upgraded remake strives to make students improve on the basis of the original, avoid misunderstandings and "minefields" in the previous composition, and make the composition after the remake thoroughly remould itself. Of course, the composition upgrade does not require students to upgrade everything, as long as the evaluation points are deducted and progress is made.
Upgrading and redoing can take the following forms: First, a composition has been upgraded and redone many times. Break through bit by bit and strive for perfection in the end.
The second is to upgrade and redo the fragments. This method is mainly to re-create a paragraph for a poorly written fragment.
This method should be used persistently in the whole process of composition teaching. The third is sublimation remake.
For some students with good basic skills in composition, teachers can guide them to pursue a higher level on the basis of more successful original works after comments, so as to meet the requirements of publication. Yang Yonghong, Jiade No.1 Middle School, Yaodu District, Linfen City.
2. How to modify the composition What are the methods to modify the composition: 1, tone.
The revision of an article should be carried out in the order of the whole before the part, the big before the small, the thinking before the material, the content before the form, instead of being distracted by some details with a stroke of a pen, just like sculpture and painting, there is always a rough outline that will be gradually refined, and so is the revision of an article. It's like taking troops to fight. First, we must dispatch troops and deploy troops.
Therefore, the first step of revision is to make the clues of the whole article clear, clear and reasonable through "tone", and then sort out the paragraphs. Through "tune", the scattered becomes centralized, the chaotic becomes clear, and the incoherent becomes coherent.
2. Make up. "Supplement" is mainly to supplement the omissions and imperfections, making the article more comprehensive and complete.
For example, when an argumentative paper expounds a certain point of view, does it only analyze the positive side, mainstream, achievements and strengths of things, but not dialectically see its negative side, tributaries, problems and shortcomings, whether it only has positive side without consequences, only foreshadowing without care, whether it only sees the material but not the point of view, and whether there are necessary central sentences and punctuation sentences. At the same time, when revising, we should pay attention to using some necessary transitional words, such as "anyhow", "therefore", "anyhow", "on the contrary", "since ... then ..." and "not only ... but also", and pay attention to using some transitional phrases.
Such as "in a word" and "summary", use some turning sentences or paragraphs. These necessary transitions will make the article more complete and rigorous.
3. increase. The so-called "increase" means that when revising, by supplementing some materials, the abstract and vague articles become concrete and true, and the thin and unconvincing articles become full and powerful.
For example, in the narrative, if you just remember the "running account" simply and boring, you can consider adding some details to make the object of description more clear and full; Or add some descriptive angles. 4. Delete.
When revising, we should delete those repetitive, rambling and rambling sentences, those sentences that are slow to respond, unnecessary and self-evident, those paragraphs and materials that are off topic, off topic, divorced from opinions, contrary to facts and obviously untrue, and even if they are wonderful, we should delete them. An example has made the point clear, and there are redundant examples. 5. change.
The so-called "change" means turning those old and plain materials into new and vivid materials, and turning those vague, general, ambiguous and obscure sentences into more accurate, clear and vivid expressions. When revising, we should first look at whether the materials in the article are typical and novel. It is best to replace those old materials that have been quoted many times by others. You might as well search from your material library again to find more attractive and updated materials.
Extended data:
Writing method 1, determine the center and write the profound meaning. We should try our best to dig out the philosophy of life contained in the written events or find out its bright spots, think repeatedly and determine the central idea of the article.
Is that he is good at writing profound meanings from ordinary little things. 2. The six elements of the article should be explained clearly.
The occurrence of a thing can not be separated from six aspects: time, place, people, cause, process and result of the thing, which is the so-called "six elements". Only by explaining these aspects clearly can readers have a clear and comprehensive understanding of the things described. 3. Speak methodically and clearly.
Arrange the materials in a reasonable order according to the time. There are three kinds of general narration: direct narration, flashback and interpolation.
4, detailed properly, highlight the key points. The materials of general events are divided into primary and secondary, which can reflect the center of the article. This part should be written in detail, and the secondary content can be slightly written or not, which will leave a deep impression on readers.
5. Make things concrete. Whether you can make things specific depends on whether you are good at describing things layer by layer, that is, dividing things into several stages and writing out the development and changes of things in these stages.
Only in this way can the content of the article be concrete and vivid. 6, rendering environment, vivid and touching.