Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - What are the common argumentation methods for refuting papers?
What are the common argumentation methods for refuting papers?
Have China people lost confidence? Refuting the wrong argument by refuting the argument mainly adopts the argument method of disproof.

This article is a refutation. What is refuted is the pessimistic argument that "China people have lost confidence". The key to this pessimistic argument is "generalizing by partiality", as Lu Xun pointed out: "It is simply slander to say that China people have lost self-confidence and refer to some people, but if we generalize by partiality". Taking reality as the latitude and history as the organizational material, the author sets out from reality, puts forward the other side's argument (the first 1 natural paragraph), then leads to the other side's argument (the second natural paragraph), and then admits that the argument put forward is true, but he can't draw the conclusion that "China people have lost confidence" or demonstrate the middle argument (the third to fifth natural paragraphs), which extends to history and then from It also demonstrates the correct argument of "China is a confident China man" with ancient and modern examples, which is an indirect rebuttal to the fallacy of the other side (paragraphs 6-8); Finally, it is both a summary of history and reality. Come to the conclusion that "whether you are confident or not, Premier No.1' s article is not sufficient, please look underground yourself", take care of the topic and answer the questions raised by the topic.