There will inevitably be some big and small mistakes and problems in paper writing. Errors are allowed, which is a normal phenomenon, but as long as they occur, they do not constitute academic misconduct. Academic misconduct has a clear definition in academic circles, and general problems and mistakes will not constitute academic misconduct. If the importance of mistakes is high, it may constitute academic misconduct, so we need to look at the nature and importance of mistakes.

Academic misconduct generally refers to plagiarism, plagiarism, tampering, forgery, and multiple contributions. These behaviors seriously violate academic ethics, scientific and rigorous academic spirit, corrupt academic atmosphere and seriously affect the healthy development of academic circles. If it is a general mistake, its nature and importance are far less than academic misconduct, and the author of general mistakes and problems can only modify or supplement it. Therefore, the author need not worry about academic misconduct.

There is also a numerical standard to judge academic misconduct, which is the repetition rate of articles. Once the repetition rate of articles reaches a certain proportion, it constitutes plagiarism and academic misconduct. Different levels of publications have different numerical standards. Generally speaking, the requirements for high-level core publications are more stringent.

The standard of ordinary journals is relatively loose, which requires authors to control the citation ratio of articles in strict accordance with the repetition rate standard. The lower the proportion of cited documents, the better, which proves that the article is original and naturally there is no possibility of academic misconduct.

As long as we carefully experiment, summarize data, analyze data, and reasonably quote literature, and the article has its own unique opinions and conclusions, the article will not involve academic misconduct, and the general mistakes in the game can be corrected in time.