1. Doubt method
That is to say, according to the questioning idea of "what-why-how", the argument is refined. If you write a composition on the topic of talking about manners, you can use this method to design sub-arguments: ① Manner is a virtue, a cultured and perfect temperament and style (what is it); 2 Being gracious can earn respect from others, enhance the love between people, and help you live in harmony (why); (3) To be graceful, we must strengthen the cultivation of moral sentiments, abandon vulgar words and deeds, and consciously cultivate good manners (how).
Step 2 classify
In the process of discussion, when using multi-angle analysis to clarify several reasons for juxtaposition, we should extract several arguments in different categories. For example, if you write a composition on the topic of "Looking at the high-tech solution of this mountain", you can use this method to design sub-arguments: ① Looking at the high mountain from this mountain is an insatiable spirit; (2) this mountain looks at the height of that mountain, which is a spirit of Excellence; (3) Looking at that mountain from one mountain is an enterprising spirit; This is a spirit of striving for the upper reaches.
Step by step method
It is based on the thinking mode of "gradual deepening" to refine the argument. If you write a composition on the topic of "Don't be a little good", you can use this method to design sub-arguments: ① Happiness is a little good, which reflects the beauty of the soul; (2) Taking pleasure in "small favors" can make the collective unite, love and help each other harmoniously; Happiness, as a kind of "small kindness", is conducive to the improvement of the whole social atmosphere. From individual to collective to society, the scope is from small to large, and the meaning is from shallow to deep.
4. Contrast method
That is, compare two different things or different situations of the same thing, and refine arguments from both positive and negative aspects. If you write a composition on the topic of "how to evaluate yourself", you can use this method to design sub-arguments: ① If you evaluate yourself correctly and see your strengths and weaknesses, you will make continuous efforts and progress; 2 overestimate yourself, look down on others, be willful and not work hard, and you will stagnate.
5. Dialectics
Based on the law of dialectical thinking, it adopts multi-angle and multi-sided methods to refine sub-arguments from point to surface, from subject to time, from outside to inside. If you write a composition on the topic of "learning and asking questions", you can use this method to design sub-arguments: ① learning and knowing, learning widely, and asking questions diligently are interlinked; If you can't ask, you won't learn, and if you can't learn, you won't ask.
The above methods of refining sub-arguments are often used cross-synthetically in practical application and operation. As long as we master the principle of refining sub-arguments around the central argument in the process of using these methods, all problems will be solved.