1. completeness: first, the reviewer needs to check whether the paper is complete, including all necessary parts, such as title, abstract, introduction, method, result, discussion and conclusion.
2. Format: Secondly, the reviewer will check whether the format of the paper meets the requirements of the journal or conference, including font, line spacing, margins, citation format, etc.
3. Content quality: The auditor will make an in-depth evaluation of the content of the paper, including scientific research methods, reliability of data, accuracy of analysis, depth and breadth of discussion, etc.
4. Innovation: The reviewer will evaluate the innovation of the paper, that is, whether the paper puts forward new ideas, theories or methods, or makes new explanations or applications to existing knowledge.
5. Readability: The reviewer will evaluate the readability of the paper, including the accuracy, clarity and coherence of the language, as well as the clarity and effectiveness of charts and formulas.
6. Academic integrity: The reviewer will check whether there is plagiarism, tampering with data or other acts that violate academic integrity.
7. Relevance: The auditor will evaluate whether the topic of the paper is related to the topic of the journal or conference, and whether the research results of the paper have practical significance and application value in this field.
8. Feedback from reviewers: Reviewers will consider feedback from reviewers, including their comments and suggestions on the paper.
The above are the main points in the process of academic paper evaluation, and each point is an important factor affecting whether the paper is accepted or not.